The seismic ground motion along a geological cross- section from Tilak Bridge to Punjabi Bagh in Delhi city has been simulated at every 130 m with a hybrid technique (modal summation and finite differences). We use two earthquake source scenarios: (1) 27 August 1960, M = 6.0 at a distance of about 45 km (near source) and (2) a large (M = 8.0) earthquake due in the central seismic gap in the Himalayan region, at a distance of about 225 km (far source). We focus on the influence of the seismic source location and focal mechanism on site-response, which, in general, is neglected in tradi- tional site-effect studies. We compare the Response Spectra Ratio (RSR) for frequency up to 3 Hz compu- ted due to far and near sources. We observe 6–7 times higher amplification in the radial component at around 2–2.5 Hz due to the far source as-compared to the near source. However, there is some amplification, of the order 2–3, at lower frequencies (less than 1 Hz) due to the near source, which is missing when the far source is considered. To validate our results, we compare the RSR, obtained from the signals at soft sites, namely CPCB, IHC and CSIR, normalized to the bedrock Ridge site, recorded during Chamoli earthquake of 1999, with that at similar sites theoretically computed along our 2D geological cross-sections.

Influence of source distance on site-effects in Delhi city

VACCARI, FRANCO;PANZA, GIULIANO
2006-01-01

Abstract

The seismic ground motion along a geological cross- section from Tilak Bridge to Punjabi Bagh in Delhi city has been simulated at every 130 m with a hybrid technique (modal summation and finite differences). We use two earthquake source scenarios: (1) 27 August 1960, M = 6.0 at a distance of about 45 km (near source) and (2) a large (M = 8.0) earthquake due in the central seismic gap in the Himalayan region, at a distance of about 225 km (far source). We focus on the influence of the seismic source location and focal mechanism on site-response, which, in general, is neglected in tradi- tional site-effect studies. We compare the Response Spectra Ratio (RSR) for frequency up to 3 Hz compu- ted due to far and near sources. We observe 6–7 times higher amplification in the radial component at around 2–2.5 Hz due to the far source as-compared to the near source. However, there is some amplification, of the order 2–3, at lower frequencies (less than 1 Hz) due to the near source, which is missing when the far source is considered. To validate our results, we compare the RSR, obtained from the signals at soft sites, namely CPCB, IHC and CSIR, normalized to the bedrock Ridge site, recorded during Chamoli earthquake of 1999, with that at similar sites theoretically computed along our 2D geological cross-sections.
2006
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/1833438
 Avviso

Registrazione in corso di verifica.
La registrazione di questo prodotto non è ancora stata validata in ArTS.

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact