Interval breast cancers (IBC) have been of great concern since breast mammogram screening programs were introduced. We compared IBC to screen-detected cancers (SDC). IBC accounted for one-fifth of all breast cancers diagnosed in women who followed the regional screening program. IBC appeared to be more aggressive than SDC in terms of tumor invasiveness, size, and St Gallen molecular subtype, leading to worse overall and disease-free survival. Background: The introduction of breast screening programs has raised the problem of interval breast cancers (IBC). The aims of this study were to analyze the impact of IBC on the screening program, to compare IBC and screendetected cancers (SDC), and to identify possible predictors of mortality. Patients and Methods: Patients with breast cancer diagnosed during the regional breast screening program between January 2008 and December 2013 at a single center in Italy were included. Demographic, preoperative, and postoperative data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Results: Five hundred thirty-four patients were enrolled; 106 women (19.9%) had IBC and 428 women (80.1%) SDC. IBC presented more aggressive features compared to SDC, such as tumor invasiveness (95% vs. 85%; P ¼ .005), tumor size ( pT2 37% vs. 21%; P ¼ .001), grade (G3 39% vs. 17%; P < .001), and St Gallen molecular subtype (triple negative 22% vs. 7%; P < .001), resulting in higher distant recurrence rate (8% vs. 2%; P ¼ .009) and worse overall and disease-free survival (P ¼ .03 and P ¼ .001, respectively). Cox multivariate regression analysis identified St Gallen molecular subtype as the only predictor of mortality in patients with breast cancer (P ¼ .03). Conclusion: IBC accounted for one-fifth of all breast cancers diagnosed in women who followed the regional screening program. Furthermore, IBC appeared to have more aggressive features compared to SDC, leading to worse survival. These worse survivals depended on St Gallen molecular subtype.

Interval Breast Cancer Versus Screen-Detected Cancer: Comparison of Clinicopathologic Characteristics in a Single-Center Analysis

BELLIO, GABRIELE;GIUDICI, FABIOLA;Tonutti, Maura;ZANCONATI, FABRIZIO;BORTUL, MARINA
2017-01-01

Abstract

Interval breast cancers (IBC) have been of great concern since breast mammogram screening programs were introduced. We compared IBC to screen-detected cancers (SDC). IBC accounted for one-fifth of all breast cancers diagnosed in women who followed the regional screening program. IBC appeared to be more aggressive than SDC in terms of tumor invasiveness, size, and St Gallen molecular subtype, leading to worse overall and disease-free survival. Background: The introduction of breast screening programs has raised the problem of interval breast cancers (IBC). The aims of this study were to analyze the impact of IBC on the screening program, to compare IBC and screendetected cancers (SDC), and to identify possible predictors of mortality. Patients and Methods: Patients with breast cancer diagnosed during the regional breast screening program between January 2008 and December 2013 at a single center in Italy were included. Demographic, preoperative, and postoperative data were prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed. Results: Five hundred thirty-four patients were enrolled; 106 women (19.9%) had IBC and 428 women (80.1%) SDC. IBC presented more aggressive features compared to SDC, such as tumor invasiveness (95% vs. 85%; P ¼ .005), tumor size ( pT2 37% vs. 21%; P ¼ .001), grade (G3 39% vs. 17%; P < .001), and St Gallen molecular subtype (triple negative 22% vs. 7%; P < .001), resulting in higher distant recurrence rate (8% vs. 2%; P ¼ .009) and worse overall and disease-free survival (P ¼ .03 and P ¼ .001, respectively). Cox multivariate regression analysis identified St Gallen molecular subtype as the only predictor of mortality in patients with breast cancer (P ¼ .03). Conclusion: IBC accounted for one-fifth of all breast cancers diagnosed in women who followed the regional screening program. Furthermore, IBC appeared to have more aggressive features compared to SDC, leading to worse survival. These worse survivals depended on St Gallen molecular subtype.
2017
11-apr-2017
Pubblicato
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S152682091730174X?via%3Dihub
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S152682091730174X-main.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Digital Rights Management non definito
Dimensione 407.03 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
407.03 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Bellio.pdf

Open Access dal 13/04/2018

Tipologia: Bozza finale post-referaggio (post-print)
Licenza: Digital Rights Management non definito
Dimensione 518.34 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
518.34 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/2904408
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 26
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 25
social impact