The relationships among perceptual elements in a visual field determine both contrast and assimilation phenomena: Perceptual differences are enhanced in contrast and decreased in assimilation. Gestalt psychologists raised an intriguing paradox by explaining both phenomena as the result of perceptual belongingness; in fact, Benary proposed that belongingness determines contrast, whereas Fuchs suggested that it determines assimilation. We propose that both grouping stability and grouping intentionality are related to this paradox. In four experiments we manipulated both stability and intentionality, to verify whether contrast or assimilation will occur. We found that intentionality and multi-stability elicit assimilation; whereas non-intentionality and stability elicit contrast. Results are discussed within the previous literature on the relationship between lightness induction and perceptual belongingness.

The direction of lightness induction is affected by grouping stability and intentionality

Agostini, Tiziano;Murgia, Mauro;Prpic, Valter;Santoro, Ilaria;Sors, Fabrizio;Galmonte Alessandra
2016-01-01

Abstract

The relationships among perceptual elements in a visual field determine both contrast and assimilation phenomena: Perceptual differences are enhanced in contrast and decreased in assimilation. Gestalt psychologists raised an intriguing paradox by explaining both phenomena as the result of perceptual belongingness; in fact, Benary proposed that belongingness determines contrast, whereas Fuchs suggested that it determines assimilation. We propose that both grouping stability and grouping intentionality are related to this paradox. In four experiments we manipulated both stability and intentionality, to verify whether contrast or assimilation will occur. We found that intentionality and multi-stability elicit assimilation; whereas non-intentionality and stability elicit contrast. Results are discussed within the previous literature on the relationship between lightness induction and perceptual belongingness.
2016
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0301006616671273
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Perception.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Digital Rights Management non definito
Dimensione 147.23 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
147.23 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/2913419
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact