After having been relegated to the austere halls of academia for centuries, in the last decades human sciences have more and more frequently been called to get mixed up with the outside world. With its focus on people and on their relations, anthropology (Appadurai 1996; 2014; Latour 2006; 2012) has represented one of the most brilliant examples of the fruitfulness of this evasion, specifically in the field of international cooperation (Olivier de Sardan 2005; Fassin 2012). In this report I will try to argue that, in a multi-disciplinary perspective, a joint anthropological and ethnolinguistic approach to the field can be very productive. An attentive and well focused lexical mapping of specific domains, can in fact help to significantly reduce the time anthropologists usually spend in data gathering through participant observation and face to face interviews. This approach seems particularly useful when funds are object-driven and the time scheduled for the analysis of the context quite insufficient. I will try to demonstrate this thesis through the discussion of two case studies: 1. a preservation project among the Ogiek communities of the Mau Forest in Kenya, and 2. a medical project designed for the Hamar and Dhaassanach peoples of Ethiopia.

When ethnolinguistics breaks out of academia. A Report from Africa and international cooperation

Micheli Ilaria
2018-01-01

Abstract

After having been relegated to the austere halls of academia for centuries, in the last decades human sciences have more and more frequently been called to get mixed up with the outside world. With its focus on people and on their relations, anthropology (Appadurai 1996; 2014; Latour 2006; 2012) has represented one of the most brilliant examples of the fruitfulness of this evasion, specifically in the field of international cooperation (Olivier de Sardan 2005; Fassin 2012). In this report I will try to argue that, in a multi-disciplinary perspective, a joint anthropological and ethnolinguistic approach to the field can be very productive. An attentive and well focused lexical mapping of specific domains, can in fact help to significantly reduce the time anthropologists usually spend in data gathering through participant observation and face to face interviews. This approach seems particularly useful when funds are object-driven and the time scheduled for the analysis of the context quite insufficient. I will try to demonstrate this thesis through the discussion of two case studies: 1. a preservation project among the Ogiek communities of the Mau Forest in Kenya, and 2. a medical project designed for the Hamar and Dhaassanach peoples of Ethiopia.
2018
11-dic-2018
Pubblicato
https://riviste-clueb.online/index.php/anpub/article/view/131
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2018_Report_AP.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo completo
Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 235.12 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
235.12 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/2932568
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact