Taking Italy as a case study, the paper aims to investigate the effects that global legal indicators – that is, quantitative collections of data purporting to compare and rank states’ performances with regard to an array of legal issues – might have on domestic legal systems. To this purpose, the paper examines the changes brought to the Italian legal framework by four selected indicators: the ‘Freedom in the World’ Reports published by Freedom House, the ‘Corruption Perceptions Index’ annually released by Transparency International, the US Department of State’s ‘Trafficking in Persons’ Reports and the World Bank’s ‘Doing Business’ Reports. As the analysis will show, these indicators have variedly penetrated the Italian legal domain and have concurred with other hard and soft law instruments in promoting reform agendas, sets of arguments and beliefs, as well quantitative approaches to legal phenomena. While more can be done to understand the outcomes of global legal indicators, the study provides an empirical basis for the claim that global indicators have legal strings attached and fully deserve lawyers’ attention.

Measuring (the Effects of) Measurements: Four Global Legal Indicators in Italy

marta infantino
2020-01-01

Abstract

Taking Italy as a case study, the paper aims to investigate the effects that global legal indicators – that is, quantitative collections of data purporting to compare and rank states’ performances with regard to an array of legal issues – might have on domestic legal systems. To this purpose, the paper examines the changes brought to the Italian legal framework by four selected indicators: the ‘Freedom in the World’ Reports published by Freedom House, the ‘Corruption Perceptions Index’ annually released by Transparency International, the US Department of State’s ‘Trafficking in Persons’ Reports and the World Bank’s ‘Doing Business’ Reports. As the analysis will show, these indicators have variedly penetrated the Italian legal domain and have concurred with other hard and soft law instruments in promoting reform agendas, sets of arguments and beliefs, as well quantitative approaches to legal phenomena. While more can be done to understand the outcomes of global legal indicators, the study provides an empirical basis for the claim that global indicators have legal strings attached and fully deserve lawyers’ attention.
2020
Pubblicato
https://www.theitalianlawjournal.it/
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
ItalLJ_2020_INFANTINO.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Pdf dell'intero fasciolo accessibile liberamente sul sito dell'editore
Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 509.77 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
509.77 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/2980295
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact