Do students use ChatGPT to cheat? What constitutes an acceptable use of AI in supporting learning, writing essays, online exams, etc? And what should be considered unacceptable? Are the “rules of the game” clear for university staff and students? And to what extent is AI literacy part of training in higher education? These were just a few of the questions debated by delegates from 33 countries that convened in Rome for the recent eighth plenary meeting of the Council of Europe Platform on Ethics, Transparency and Integrity in Education (ETINED), organised in collaboration with CIMEA (the Information Centre on Academic Mobility and Equivalence) at Marconi University.
Survey suggests students do not see use of AI as cheating
Chiara Finocchietti
2024-01-01
Abstract
Do students use ChatGPT to cheat? What constitutes an acceptable use of AI in supporting learning, writing essays, online exams, etc? And what should be considered unacceptable? Are the “rules of the game” clear for university staff and students? And to what extent is AI literacy part of training in higher education? These were just a few of the questions debated by delegates from 33 countries that convened in Rome for the recent eighth plenary meeting of the Council of Europe Platform on Ethics, Transparency and Integrity in Education (ETINED), organised in collaboration with CIMEA (the Information Centre on Academic Mobility and Equivalence) at Marconi University.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
