All treatment decisions involve the tacit decision to treat or to withhold treatment. Although often not expressed, the “not to treat” side of the analysis of risks versus benefits is quite important and should be explored in patients with gender identity dysphoria (GID) and its variants. The availability of somatic treatments as accepted interventions for the overall management of GID raises a number of bioethical issues. The medical literature rarely is as rife with affect as when this issue is discussed by those who oppose the application of surgical treatments as part of the treatment plan for gender transmutation.

Ethical issues for the practitioner work in transgender care

D'Errico S
2015-01-01

Abstract

All treatment decisions involve the tacit decision to treat or to withhold treatment. Although often not expressed, the “not to treat” side of the analysis of risks versus benefits is quite important and should be explored in patients with gender identity dysphoria (GID) and its variants. The availability of somatic treatments as accepted interventions for the overall management of GID raises a number of bioethical issues. The medical literature rarely is as rife with affect as when this issue is discussed by those who oppose the application of surgical treatments as part of the treatment plan for gender transmutation.
2015
978-88-470-5695-4
978-88-470-5696-1
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Cap.38.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Copyright Editore
Dimensione 110.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
110.4 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/2959870
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact