We synthesized our present understanding of pelagic–benthic (P–B) interactions in the northern Adriatic Sea (NAS) and Chesapeake Bay (CB) in a comparative analysis that builds on a prior comparison. We focus on primary production (PP) in the water column and benthos, the sedimentation and horizontal transport of particlulate organic matter (POM), and biogeochemical responses of the benthic community to sedimentation. Phytoplankton net PP (NPP) remains higher in CB (five times that in NAS) and rates of benthic respiration appear greater in CB (three times that in NAS). A lower fraction of phytoplankton NPP plus riverine inputs of POM is deposited to sediments in the NAS (23%) compared to CB (83%). A high percentage of organic matter inputs are respired by plankton and exported in the NAS and CB, and benthic communities respired a similar percentage of POM (86% in the NAS, 92% in CB). Net release of regenerated N from the benthos (0.2–0.3 mol N m−2 year−1) is also similar in both systems. At 0.53 mol N m−2 year−1, rates of benthic denitrification are higher in CB than in the NAS (0.3 mol N m−2 year−1), and the NAS appears to bury similar fractions of deposited N and P (N: 23% in NAS, 19% in CB; P: 50% in NAS, 45% in CB). To address the impacts of future climate‐driven warming and acceleration of the water cycle, we recommend a return to sustained monitoring combined with numerical simulations to allow improved understanding and predictions of changes in P–B interactions.
Advances in Our Understanding of Pelagic–Benthic Coupling
Stefano CovelliMembro del Collaboration Group
;
2021-01-01
Abstract
We synthesized our present understanding of pelagic–benthic (P–B) interactions in the northern Adriatic Sea (NAS) and Chesapeake Bay (CB) in a comparative analysis that builds on a prior comparison. We focus on primary production (PP) in the water column and benthos, the sedimentation and horizontal transport of particlulate organic matter (POM), and biogeochemical responses of the benthic community to sedimentation. Phytoplankton net PP (NPP) remains higher in CB (five times that in NAS) and rates of benthic respiration appear greater in CB (three times that in NAS). A lower fraction of phytoplankton NPP plus riverine inputs of POM is deposited to sediments in the NAS (23%) compared to CB (83%). A high percentage of organic matter inputs are respired by plankton and exported in the NAS and CB, and benthic communities respired a similar percentage of POM (86% in the NAS, 92% in CB). Net release of regenerated N from the benthos (0.2–0.3 mol N m−2 year−1) is also similar in both systems. At 0.53 mol N m−2 year−1, rates of benthic denitrification are higher in CB than in the NAS (0.3 mol N m−2 year−1), and the NAS appears to bury similar fractions of deposited N and P (N: 23% in NAS, 19% in CB; P: 50% in NAS, 45% in CB). To address the impacts of future climate‐driven warming and acceleration of the water cycle, we recommend a return to sustained monitoring combined with numerical simulations to allow improved understanding and predictions of changes in P–B interactions.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Northern Adriatic and Chesapeake Bay_book_2020.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Descrizione: libro completo
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Copyright Editore
Dimensione
7.39 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
7.39 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
9781119543626.ch8.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Descrizione: Capitolo 8
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Copyright Editore
Dimensione
1.22 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.22 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.