Schleiermacher reviewed Kant’s Pragmatic Anthropology for the journal Athenaeum in 1799. Below the surface of a harsh and disrespectful tone, the review has a remarkable philosophical value. As a consequence of his idea of human nature, Kant is charged by Schleiermacher of “realism”. Ironically, Schleiermacher suggests that the work, with its popular style, is more of a Kantology than of an anthropology: that is, it elevates the daily habits and idiosyncrasies of the author to an alleged empirical description of the human being. With this, Schleiermacher anticipates a new style in philosophy, followed by many subsequent critics of philosophical anthropology.
Schleiermacher recensore dell’Antropologia pragmatica di Kant
Riccardo Martinelli
2023-01-01
Abstract
Schleiermacher reviewed Kant’s Pragmatic Anthropology for the journal Athenaeum in 1799. Below the surface of a harsh and disrespectful tone, the review has a remarkable philosophical value. As a consequence of his idea of human nature, Kant is charged by Schleiermacher of “realism”. Ironically, Schleiermacher suggests that the work, with its popular style, is more of a Kantology than of an anthropology: that is, it elevates the daily habits and idiosyncrasies of the author to an alleged empirical description of the human being. With this, Schleiermacher anticipates a new style in philosophy, followed by many subsequent critics of philosophical anthropology.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Riccardo Martinelli - Schleiermacher.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Digital Rights Management non definito
Dimensione
533.95 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
533.95 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.