The chapter aims to present the debate on the legal methods for comparative research. It focuses in particular on the fact that the only way to determine the practicability and usefulness of a chosen method is to test it on the results of a specific research. Therefore, the study analyzes the use of the factual questionnaire – stemming from the research of Rudolf Schlesinger – in several comparative pieces of research, including the RAPID project, which led to this edited collection.
Making comparative law projects: a matter of methodology
Paola Monaco
2024-01-01
Abstract
The chapter aims to present the debate on the legal methods for comparative research. It focuses in particular on the fact that the only way to determine the practicability and usefulness of a chosen method is to test it on the results of a specific research. Therefore, the study analyzes the use of the factual questionnaire – stemming from the research of Rudolf Schlesinger – in several comparative pieces of research, including the RAPID project, which led to this edited collection.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
9781035312344-chapter2.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: capitolo
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
147.4 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
147.4 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
