In a renowned essay, Odo Marquard’s set a cornerstone in defining anthropology from a history of concepts point of view. In the light of more recent researches, some of his conclusions are here reconsidered and criticised. The concept of anthropology, as de- veloped by Herder, Kant, Wilhelm von Humboldt, romantic philosophers and physi- cians, and finally by Hegel and some of his followers, offers no evidence for Marquard’s alleged opposition between anthropology and philosophy of history. On the one side, in Kant’s or Hegel’s work anthropology is not as peripheral as Marquard argued; on the other side, romantic anthropologists developed a deep interest towards historical perspectives. Rather, anthropology was quite often considered as a non- metaphysical alternative to psychology. These results also suggest a revision as to the role of anthropology on a broader historical scale.
Nature or History? Philosophical Anthropology in the History of Concepts
MARTINELLI, RICCARDO
2010-01-01
Abstract
In a renowned essay, Odo Marquard’s set a cornerstone in defining anthropology from a history of concepts point of view. In the light of more recent researches, some of his conclusions are here reconsidered and criticised. The concept of anthropology, as de- veloped by Herder, Kant, Wilhelm von Humboldt, romantic philosophers and physi- cians, and finally by Hegel and some of his followers, offers no evidence for Marquard’s alleged opposition between anthropology and philosophy of history. On the one side, in Kant’s or Hegel’s work anthropology is not as peripheral as Marquard argued; on the other side, romantic anthropologists developed a deep interest towards historical perspectives. Rather, anthropology was quite often considered as a non- metaphysical alternative to psychology. These results also suggest a revision as to the role of anthropology on a broader historical scale.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.