The paper critically reconstructs the analysis of the logical structure of detached statements, developed by J. Raz, in the light of his externalist conception of reasons for action (sec. 1-2). The main objections to Raz's antireductionist approach are presented, trying to clarify their scope, efficacy,and dependency from an internalist conception (sec. 3). In the last part (sec. 4-5), on the basis of logico-linguistic considerations compatible with Razian conceptual frame, I show how the existence of detached statements results in some unavoidable contradictions affecting is theory of legal language.
Tertium non datur: sulla pretesa autonomia concettuale degli asserti distaccati
MUFFATO, NICOLA
2013-01-01
Abstract
The paper critically reconstructs the analysis of the logical structure of detached statements, developed by J. Raz, in the light of his externalist conception of reasons for action (sec. 1-2). The main objections to Raz's antireductionist approach are presented, trying to clarify their scope, efficacy,and dependency from an internalist conception (sec. 3). In the last part (sec. 4-5), on the basis of logico-linguistic considerations compatible with Razian conceptual frame, I show how the existence of detached statements results in some unavoidable contradictions affecting is theory of legal language.File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
