The paper critically reconstructs the analysis of the logical structure of detached statements, developed by J. Raz, in the light of his externalist conception of reasons for action (sec. 1-2). The main objections to Raz's antireductionist approach are presented, trying to clarify their scope, efficacy,and dependency from an internalist conception (sec. 3). In the last part (sec. 4-5), on the basis of logico-linguistic considerations compatible with Razian conceptual frame, I show how the existence of detached statements results in some unavoidable contradictions affecting is theory of legal language.
Titolo: | Tertium non datur: sulla pretesa autonomia concettuale degli asserti distaccati | |
Autori: | ||
Data di pubblicazione: | 2013 | |
Rivista: | ||
Abstract: | The paper critically reconstructs the analysis of the logical structure of detached statements, developed by J. Raz, in the light of his externalist conception of reasons for action (sec. 1-2). The main objections to Raz's antireductionist approach are presented, trying to clarify their scope, efficacy,and dependency from an internalist conception (sec. 3). In the last part (sec. 4-5), on the basis of logico-linguistic considerations compatible with Razian conceptual frame, I show how the existence of detached statements results in some unavoidable contradictions affecting is theory of legal language. | |
Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11368/2759783 | |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.1 Articolo in Rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.