The paper critically reconstructs the analysis of the logical structure of detached statements, developed by J. Raz, in the light of his externalist conception of reasons for action (sec. 1-2). The main objections to Raz's antireductionist approach are presented, trying to clarify their scope, efficacy,and dependency from an internalist conception (sec. 3). In the last part (sec. 4-5), on the basis of logico-linguistic considerations compatible with Razian conceptual frame, I show how the existence of detached statements results in some unavoidable contradictions affecting is theory of legal language.

Tertium non datur: sulla pretesa autonomia concettuale degli asserti distaccati

MUFFATO, NICOLA
2013

Abstract

The paper critically reconstructs the analysis of the logical structure of detached statements, developed by J. Raz, in the light of his externalist conception of reasons for action (sec. 1-2). The main objections to Raz's antireductionist approach are presented, trying to clarify their scope, efficacy,and dependency from an internalist conception (sec. 3). In the last part (sec. 4-5), on the basis of logico-linguistic considerations compatible with Razian conceptual frame, I show how the existence of detached statements results in some unavoidable contradictions affecting is theory of legal language.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11368/2759783
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact