Sturz & Bodily [1] propose an alternative interpretation for the results presented by Kelly et al. [2], who trained pigeons and chicks in a rectangular environment to find food located in one of two geometrically identical corners. Once the birds were locating the food accurately, they were presented with a novel L-shaped arena. The L-shaped arena provides unique predictions of search behaviour for principal axis-, medial axis- and local geometry-based strategies. The patterns of search behaviour reported support that pigeons were showing primary reliance on the medial axis, whereas chicks showed a primary reliance on local geometrical cues with a secondary reliance on the medial axis.
A misunderstanding of principal and medial axes? Reply to Sturz & Bodily / D. M., Kelly; S., Durocher; Chiandetti, Cinzia; G., Vallortigara. - In: BIOLOGY LETTERS. - ISSN 1744-9561. - 7:(2011), pp. 649-650. [10.1098/rsbl.2011.0482]
A misunderstanding of principal and medial axes? Reply to Sturz & Bodily
CHIANDETTI, CINZIA;
2011-01-01
Abstract
Sturz & Bodily [1] propose an alternative interpretation for the results presented by Kelly et al. [2], who trained pigeons and chicks in a rectangular environment to find food located in one of two geometrically identical corners. Once the birds were locating the food accurately, they were presented with a novel L-shaped arena. The L-shaped arena provides unique predictions of search behaviour for principal axis-, medial axis- and local geometry-based strategies. The patterns of search behaviour reported support that pigeons were showing primary reliance on the medial axis, whereas chicks showed a primary reliance on local geometrical cues with a secondary reliance on the medial axis.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


