ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste
ArTS è il sistema di gestione integrata dei dati della ricerca adottato dall' Università degli Studi di Trieste
EnglishThis article attempts to propose critical reflections on “historical” models of Constitutional Review.The gradual depletion of the simplified classification system of constitutional review has been identified, by some scholars, as a failure of the bipolar American-European model. This means that it is necessary to rethink the approach to analysing constitutional review, in light of legal traditions, positive law within legal systems, and comparative methodologies. Consequently, judicial review could be studied according to the internal perspectives of the Supreme and Constitutional Courts’ decision-making processes, rather than externally observable legal characteristics. As of recently, legal studies have been converging with other sciences, such as cognitive science. They have been considering the relationship between consciousness and comparison, and even the field of cognitive errors in judgment, and the development of decisions taken by Courts.
| Titolo: | Dynamic Reflections on Constitutional Justice | |
| Autori: | ||
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2014 | |
| Rivista: | ||
| Abstract: | This article attempts to propose critical reflections on “historical” models of Constitutional Review.The gradual depletion of the simplified classification system of constitutional review has been identified, by some scholars, as a failure of the bipolar American-European model. This means that it is necessary to rethink the approach to analysing constitutional review, in light of legal traditions, positive law within legal systems, and comparative methodologies. Consequently, judicial review could be studied according to the internal perspectives of the Supreme and Constitutional Courts’ decision-making processes, rather than externally observable legal characteristics. As of recently, legal studies have been converging with other sciences, such as cognitive science. They have been considering the relationship between consciousness and comparison, and even the field of cognitive errors in judgment, and the development of decisions taken by Courts. | |
| Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11368/2789127 | |
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/blr.2014.52012 | |
| URL: | http://www.scirp.org/journal/blr/ | |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.1 Articolo in Rivista |
