the first part contextualizes the lel and political doctrine by Beccaria, the second one reconstructs ideology, theory and theoretical model of legal syllogism, the third one criticizes the lgislative conception of law the model incorporates
Titolo: | Cosa resta del sillogismo giudiziale? Riflessioni a partire da Beccaria |
Autori: | |
Data di pubblicazione: | 2015 |
Rivista: | |
Abstract: | the first part contextualizes the lel and political doctrine by Beccaria, the second one reconstructs ideology, theory and theoretical model of legal syllogism, the third one criticizes the lgislative conception of law the model incorporates |
Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11368/2841376 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | http://dx.doi.org/10.1436/79266 |
URL: | https://www.rivisteweb.it/issn/1120-9607/issue/6603 |
Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.1 Articolo in Rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Licenza | |
---|---|---|---|---|
sillogismo.pdf | articolo principale | Documento in Versione Editoriale | Digital Rights Management non definito | Administrator Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.