We criticize two assumptions behind Abramson's emphasis on an academic crisis of comparative psychology: the identification of psychology with the study of behavior; the idea that the study of cognition is based on “suppositions” and “beliefs” (in Abramson’s words). To answer all Tinbergen’s questions, comparative psychology should complement other perspectives and intersect various levels of analysis (neural, genetic, ecological, evolutionary).

Comparative Psychology: A Perspective Rather than a Discipline. Commentary: A Crisis in Comparative Psychology: Where Have All the Undergraduates Gone?

CHIANDETTI, CINZIA;GERBINO, WALTER
2015-01-01

Abstract

We criticize two assumptions behind Abramson's emphasis on an academic crisis of comparative psychology: the identification of psychology with the study of behavior; the idea that the study of cognition is based on “suppositions” and “beliefs” (in Abramson’s words). To answer all Tinbergen’s questions, comparative psychology should complement other perspectives and intersect various levels of analysis (neural, genetic, ecological, evolutionary).
2015
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4658579/
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Chiandetti & Gerbino 2015 commentary.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Digital Rights Management non definito
Dimensione 76.58 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
76.58 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/2865470
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact