The observed vacuum optical rotation signal reported in [1] has now been excluded by more recent results from the PVLAS Collaboration [2], which show that it was due to an instrumental artifact and was not of physical origin. These new data therefore also exclude the possible interpretation of the signal reported in [1], as caused by the existence of a light, neutral, spin-zero particle.
Erratum: Experimental observation of optical rotation generated in vacuum by a magnetic field (Physical Review Letters (2006) 96 (110406)) / Zavattini, Emilio; Zavattini, G.; Ruoso, Giuseppe; Polacco, E.; Milotti, E.; Karuza, M.; Gastaldi, U.; DI DOMENICO, Giuseppe; Della Valle, F.; Cimino, Roberto; Carusotto, S.; Cantatore, G.; Bregant, M.. - In: PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS. - ISSN 0031-9007. - 99:12(2007), pp. 129901.129901-129901.129901. [10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.129901]
Erratum: Experimental observation of optical rotation generated in vacuum by a magnetic field (Physical Review Letters (2006) 96 (110406))
ZAVATTINI, EMILIO;RUOSO, GIUSEPPE;Milotti, E.;Karuza, M.;DI DOMENICO, GIUSEPPE;Della Valle, F.;CIMINO, ROBERTO;Cantatore, G.;Bregant, M.
2007-01-01
Abstract
The observed vacuum optical rotation signal reported in [1] has now been excluded by more recent results from the PVLAS Collaboration [2], which show that it was due to an instrumental artifact and was not of physical origin. These new data therefore also exclude the possible interpretation of the signal reported in [1], as caused by the existence of a light, neutral, spin-zero particle.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
