How to deal with melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) origin is a debated topic in the literature. OBJECTIVE: We performed a worldwide survey to inquire what clinical and investigational workup is performed as well as the physicians' perception of this disease. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent via mail to clinicians involved in melanoma care from December 2015 to April 2016 using the International Dermoscopy Society website. RESULTS: 119 physicians from 47 different countries answered the questionnaire. The most reported examination was skin examination followed by CT and/or PET scans. All the participants declared asking about previous excisions of skin lesions with 81% of them asking for a histopathological slide review of previous biopsies. Half of the participants checked for a possible vitiligo phenomenon that may explain regression of the primary lesion. BRAF, cKIT, and GNAQ mutations were screened by 32% of participants. The majority of participants (76%) applied the same treatment protocols for MUP as patients with known primary melanomas of the same AJCC stage. CONCLUSION: Strong heterogeneity was found between physicians dealing with MUP. Thus, a consensus document should be strongly encouraged.
Unknown Primary Melanoma: Worldwide Survey on Clinical Management / Ribero, S., Pampena, R., Bataille, V., Moscarella, E., Thomas, L., Quaglino, P., Potenza, C., Van Akkooi, A.C.J., Testori, A., Nathan, P., Puig, S., Zalaudek, I., Argenziano, G., Longo, C.. - In: DERMATOLOGY. - ISSN 1018-8665. - STAMPA. - 232:6(2016), pp. 704-707. [10.1159/000453592]
Unknown Primary Melanoma: Worldwide Survey on Clinical Management
QUAGLINO, PIETRO;Zalaudek, Iris;
2016-01-01
Abstract
How to deal with melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) origin is a debated topic in the literature. OBJECTIVE: We performed a worldwide survey to inquire what clinical and investigational workup is performed as well as the physicians' perception of this disease. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent via mail to clinicians involved in melanoma care from December 2015 to April 2016 using the International Dermoscopy Society website. RESULTS: 119 physicians from 47 different countries answered the questionnaire. The most reported examination was skin examination followed by CT and/or PET scans. All the participants declared asking about previous excisions of skin lesions with 81% of them asking for a histopathological slide review of previous biopsies. Half of the participants checked for a possible vitiligo phenomenon that may explain regression of the primary lesion. BRAF, cKIT, and GNAQ mutations were screened by 32% of participants. The majority of participants (76%) applied the same treatment protocols for MUP as patients with known primary melanomas of the same AJCC stage. CONCLUSION: Strong heterogeneity was found between physicians dealing with MUP. Thus, a consensus document should be strongly encouraged.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown primary melanoma.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Digital Rights Management non definito
Dimensione
87.67 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
87.67 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


