In this paper I explore the idea of expected utility as a description of how we actually act and how we reason. This theory has both normative side and descriptive side. I argue that as idealized normativity it does not recognize the role of moral principle. It is possible that a coherentist strategy can have better chances to balance both our expectations on consequences and our preferences for states.
Considerazioni sul consequenzialismo
PIERPAOLO MARRONE
2015-01-01
Abstract
In this paper I explore the idea of expected utility as a description of how we actually act and how we reason. This theory has both normative side and descriptive side. I argue that as idealized normativity it does not recognize the role of moral principle. It is possible that a coherentist strategy can have better chances to balance both our expectations on consequences and our preferences for states.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
MARRONE.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
204.66 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
204.66 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
