The implementation of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has greatly increased due to its convenience and advantages from perspectives ranging from radiobiology to radio physics. Because SBRT/SRS delivers high doses in few fractions, precise dose delivery to target volumes and sufcient sparing of adjacent organs at risk (OARs) are required. Achieving these conficting objectives is challenging for all patients receiving SBRT/SRS and may be particularly challenging when SBRT/SRS is adopted for treating patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) because cumulative doses in CIEDs must be limited. Published research considering the diferent aspects of stereotactic treatment in patients with CIEDs was reviewed to summarise their fndings in the following sections: (I) conventional linear accelerator (linac)-based SBRT and SRS; (II) CyberKnife, Gamma-Knife, VERO and helical tomotherapy SBRT and SRS; and (III) proton therapy. A total of 65 patients who had CIEDs and underwent SRS, SBRT, or SABR treatments were identifed in the reviewed studies. The functionality of the CIEDs was assessed for 58 patients. Of those, CIED malfunctions (such as data loss, mode change, and inappropriate shock) were reported in four patients (6.89%). This review highlights the available sparse information in the literature by posing questions for future research

A review and analysis of stereotactic body radiotherapy and radiosurgery of patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices

Hossein Aslian
;
Francesco Longo;Mara Severgnini
2019-01-01

Abstract

The implementation of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has greatly increased due to its convenience and advantages from perspectives ranging from radiobiology to radio physics. Because SBRT/SRS delivers high doses in few fractions, precise dose delivery to target volumes and sufcient sparing of adjacent organs at risk (OARs) are required. Achieving these conficting objectives is challenging for all patients receiving SBRT/SRS and may be particularly challenging when SBRT/SRS is adopted for treating patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) because cumulative doses in CIEDs must be limited. Published research considering the diferent aspects of stereotactic treatment in patients with CIEDs was reviewed to summarise their fndings in the following sections: (I) conventional linear accelerator (linac)-based SBRT and SRS; (II) CyberKnife, Gamma-Knife, VERO and helical tomotherapy SBRT and SRS; and (III) proton therapy. A total of 65 patients who had CIEDs and underwent SRS, SBRT, or SABR treatments were identifed in the reviewed studies. The functionality of the CIEDs was assessed for 58 patients. Of those, CIED malfunctions (such as data loss, mode change, and inappropriate shock) were reported in four patients (6.89%). This review highlights the available sparse information in the literature by posing questions for future research
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
10.1007@s13246-019-00751-8.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Descrizione: The main article, which has been published online and is going to publish in the next issue of the journal
Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Copyright Editore
Dimensione 625.96 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
625.96 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/2942332
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 9
social impact