SOLAS probabilistic damage stability regulations assess the ship safety level through the attained subdivision index, which is a probabilistic measure of ship survivability combining, in principle, the probability of flooding of (groups of) compartments and the corresponding conditional survivability (the s-factor). However, the present SOLAS framework does not embed a probabilistic model for the extent of collision damage below the waterline. A “worst-case approach” is therefore used for the s-factor when there are horizontal subdivision boundaries below the waterline. This leads to a systematic underestimation of the ship survivability in presence of horizontal subdivision boundaries below the waterline, and it prevents an effective assessment of the impact of such boundaries. To make a step forward, the paper presents a probabilistic model for the extent of damage below the waterline, derived from statistical analysis of collision accidents data. From this model, a “u-factor” is defined, and it is described how the “u-factor” could be straightforwardly embedded in the SOLAS framework, in combination with “p-factor”, “r-factor” and “v-factor”, to consistently account for horizontal subdivision boundaries below the waterline, thus avoiding the need for using the “worst-case approach”. An example application is reported to quantitatively assess the effect of the “u-factor”.

Complementing SOLAS damage ship stability framework with a probabilistic description for the extent of collision damage below the waterline

Bulian G.
;
Francescutto A.;
2019-01-01

Abstract

SOLAS probabilistic damage stability regulations assess the ship safety level through the attained subdivision index, which is a probabilistic measure of ship survivability combining, in principle, the probability of flooding of (groups of) compartments and the corresponding conditional survivability (the s-factor). However, the present SOLAS framework does not embed a probabilistic model for the extent of collision damage below the waterline. A “worst-case approach” is therefore used for the s-factor when there are horizontal subdivision boundaries below the waterline. This leads to a systematic underestimation of the ship survivability in presence of horizontal subdivision boundaries below the waterline, and it prevents an effective assessment of the impact of such boundaries. To make a step forward, the paper presents a probabilistic model for the extent of damage below the waterline, derived from statistical analysis of collision accidents data. From this model, a “u-factor” is defined, and it is described how the “u-factor” could be straightforwardly embedded in the SOLAS framework, in combination with “p-factor”, “r-factor” and “v-factor”, to consistently account for horizontal subdivision boundaries below the waterline, thus avoiding the need for using the “worst-case approach”. An example application is reported to quantitatively assess the effect of the “u-factor”.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
SOLAS_extent_damage_below_waterline__Bulian_et_al__2019.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Descrizione: Paper as published
Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Copyright Editore
Dimensione 2.31 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.31 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/2948061
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 19
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 15
social impact