SOLAS probabilistic damage stability regulations assess the ship safety level through the attained subdivision index, which is a probabilistic measure of ship survivability combining, in principle, the probability of flooding of (groups of) compartments and the corresponding conditional survivability (the s-factor). However, the present SOLAS framework does not embed a probabilistic model for the extent of collision damage below the waterline. A “worst-case approach” is therefore used for the s-factor when there are horizontal subdivision boundaries below the waterline. This leads to a systematic underestimation of the ship survivability in presence of horizontal subdivision boundaries below the waterline, and it prevents an effective assessment of the impact of such boundaries. To make a step forward, the paper presents a probabilistic model for the extent of damage below the waterline, derived from statistical analysis of collision accidents data. From this model, a “u-factor” is defined, and it is described how the “u-factor” could be straightforwardly embedded in the SOLAS framework, in combination with “p-factor”, “r-factor” and “v-factor”, to consistently account for horizontal subdivision boundaries below the waterline, thus avoiding the need for using the “worst-case approach”. An example application is reported to quantitatively assess the effect of the “u-factor”.
Complementing SOLAS damage ship stability framework with a probabilistic description for the extent of collision damage below the waterline
Bulian G.
;Francescutto A.;
2019-01-01
Abstract
SOLAS probabilistic damage stability regulations assess the ship safety level through the attained subdivision index, which is a probabilistic measure of ship survivability combining, in principle, the probability of flooding of (groups of) compartments and the corresponding conditional survivability (the s-factor). However, the present SOLAS framework does not embed a probabilistic model for the extent of collision damage below the waterline. A “worst-case approach” is therefore used for the s-factor when there are horizontal subdivision boundaries below the waterline. This leads to a systematic underestimation of the ship survivability in presence of horizontal subdivision boundaries below the waterline, and it prevents an effective assessment of the impact of such boundaries. To make a step forward, the paper presents a probabilistic model for the extent of damage below the waterline, derived from statistical analysis of collision accidents data. From this model, a “u-factor” is defined, and it is described how the “u-factor” could be straightforwardly embedded in the SOLAS framework, in combination with “p-factor”, “r-factor” and “v-factor”, to consistently account for horizontal subdivision boundaries below the waterline, thus avoiding the need for using the “worst-case approach”. An example application is reported to quantitatively assess the effect of the “u-factor”.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
SOLAS_extent_damage_below_waterline__Bulian_et_al__2019.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Descrizione: Paper as published
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Copyright Editore
Dimensione
2.31 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.31 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.