PURPOSE: Isolated speech impairment is one of the most challenging clinical manifestations of stroke mimic (SM). We aimed to investigate perfusional and EEG pattern of isolated aphasia to better differentiate between vascular and epileptic etiology in emergency settings. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed 481 cases with acute focal neurological symptoms admitted to our Stroke Unit. The patients showing isolated aphasia and confirmed ischemic infarction or SM with seizure etiology on follow-up were included for subsequent analysis of clinical, neuroimaging, and EEG data. We investigated differences in CT Perfusion maps between ROI in the anatomical area compatible with clinical presentation, contralateral ROI and EEG in order to evaluate perfusion and brain oscillatory activity abnormalities. RESULTS: 45 patients presented isolated aphasia as principal neurological symptom: 27 cases due to acute ischemic event, 11 due to seizure SM, while 7 were SM due to other etiologies. Out of 11 SM patients with seizure etiology, significant hyperperfusion on CTP maps (MTT AI%<-10%) and sharp EEG waves were observed in 8 patients, while in 3 patients slight hypoperfusion (MTT AI%<20%) and slow EEG rhythms were detected. 24 out of 27 ischemic stroke patients presented severe hypoperfusion with MTT AI above the stroke threshold (MTT AI > 45%). All ischemic stroke patients presented slower EEG rhythms. CONCLUSIONS: The main finding of this study is the identification of different clinical and neuroimaging patterns of isolated aphasia with epileptic or ischemic etiology in emergency settings.

CT perfusion and EEG patterns in patients with acute isolated aphasia in seizure-related stroke mimics

Manganotti P.
;
Ajcevic M.;Caruso P.;Cova M. A.;Naccarato M.
2019-01-01

Abstract

PURPOSE: Isolated speech impairment is one of the most challenging clinical manifestations of stroke mimic (SM). We aimed to investigate perfusional and EEG pattern of isolated aphasia to better differentiate between vascular and epileptic etiology in emergency settings. METHOD: We retrospectively analyzed 481 cases with acute focal neurological symptoms admitted to our Stroke Unit. The patients showing isolated aphasia and confirmed ischemic infarction or SM with seizure etiology on follow-up were included for subsequent analysis of clinical, neuroimaging, and EEG data. We investigated differences in CT Perfusion maps between ROI in the anatomical area compatible with clinical presentation, contralateral ROI and EEG in order to evaluate perfusion and brain oscillatory activity abnormalities. RESULTS: 45 patients presented isolated aphasia as principal neurological symptom: 27 cases due to acute ischemic event, 11 due to seizure SM, while 7 were SM due to other etiologies. Out of 11 SM patients with seizure etiology, significant hyperperfusion on CTP maps (MTT AI%<-10%) and sharp EEG waves were observed in 8 patients, while in 3 patients slight hypoperfusion (MTT AI%<20%) and slow EEG rhythms were detected. 24 out of 27 ischemic stroke patients presented severe hypoperfusion with MTT AI above the stroke threshold (MTT AI > 45%). All ischemic stroke patients presented slower EEG rhythms. CONCLUSIONS: The main finding of this study is the identification of different clinical and neuroimaging patterns of isolated aphasia with epileptic or ischemic etiology in emergency settings.
2019
Pubblicato
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059131119302602
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S1059131119302602-main.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Copyright Editore
Dimensione 1.18 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.18 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/2950809
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 31
social impact