Counterlimits and identity-related arguments that oppose national constitutional interests to the primacy of EU law are not a novel notion in EU and national constitutional law. However, recent developments trace a shift from theories of counterlimits to practice. This article offers an overview of these recent developments and aims at locating them within a broader theoretical picture. The article argues that constitutional identity is essentially linked to the principle of openness of the Constitution, which characterizes contemporary European Constitutions. Both constitutional identity and the principle of openness should be interpreted not as rules (i.e. following the all-or-nothing fashion): on the contrary, the article argues that these should be balanced as principles. However, the article concludes that judicial balancing proves an effective safeguard only when specific constitutional identities are at stake, and not when the core principles of constitutionalism are under attack.

Il ruolo delle Corti costituzionali dal principio di apertura alle regole di chiusura dell'ordinamento

Pietro Faraguna
2019

Abstract

Counterlimits and identity-related arguments that oppose national constitutional interests to the primacy of EU law are not a novel notion in EU and national constitutional law. However, recent developments trace a shift from theories of counterlimits to practice. This article offers an overview of these recent developments and aims at locating them within a broader theoretical picture. The article argues that constitutional identity is essentially linked to the principle of openness of the Constitution, which characterizes contemporary European Constitutions. Both constitutional identity and the principle of openness should be interpreted not as rules (i.e. following the all-or-nothing fashion): on the contrary, the article argues that these should be balanced as principles. However, the article concludes that judicial balancing proves an effective safeguard only when specific constitutional identities are at stake, and not when the core principles of constitutionalism are under attack.
Pubblicato
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.17394/94624
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2019_10_14_DPCE_Corticost_apertura_chiusura.pdf

non disponibili

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Copyright Editore
Dimensione 308.16 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
308.16 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11368/2951610
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact