This paper aims to highlight the conceptual differences between the modern notion of “commons” and the Roman one of res communes omnium, in order to avoid the misuse of Roman notions to define modern concepts, such as that of “common goods” or “common pools resources”. The structural difference between the modern notion of “common goods” and the Roman one of res communes omnium is given by their use regime: while the “common goods” are not subject to private appropriation, the res communes omnium were appropriable in portions which did not prejudge the analogous uses that the other subsidiaries had on the good.
Res communes omnium e commons. Contro un equivoco
Mario Fiorentini
2019-01-01
Abstract
This paper aims to highlight the conceptual differences between the modern notion of “commons” and the Roman one of res communes omnium, in order to avoid the misuse of Roman notions to define modern concepts, such as that of “common goods” or “common pools resources”. The structural difference between the modern notion of “common goods” and the Roman one of res communes omnium is given by their use regime: while the “common goods” are not subject to private appropriation, the res communes omnium were appropriable in portions which did not prejudge the analogous uses that the other subsidiaries had on the good.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Res communes omnium e commons.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Copyright Editore
Dimensione
609.98 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
609.98 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.