Shigella infections are one of the top causes of diarrhea throughout the world, with Shigella flexneri being predominant in developing countries. Currently, no vaccines are widely available and increasing levels of multidrug-resistance make Shigella a high priority for vaccine development. The serotype-specific O-antigen moiety of Shigella lipopolysaccharide has been recognized as a key target for protective immunity, and many O-antigen based candidate vaccines are in development. Recently, the Generalized Modules for Membrane Antigens (GMMA) technology has been proposed as an alternative approach to traditional glycoconjugate vaccines for O-antigen delivery. Here, these two technologies are compared for a vaccine against S. flexneri serotype 6. Genetic strategies for GMMA production, conjugation approaches for linkage of the O-antigen to CRM197 carrier protein, and a large panel of analytical methods for full vaccine characterization have been put in place. In a head-to-head immunogenicity study in mice, GMMA induced higher anti-O-antigen IgG than glycoconjugate administered without Alhydrogel. When formulated on Alhydrogel, GMMA and glycoconjugate elicited similar levels of persistent anti-O-antigen IgG with bactericidal activity. Glycoconjugates are a well-established bacterial vaccine approach, but can be costly, particularly when multicomponent preparations are required. With similar immunogenicity and a simpler manufacturing process, GMMA are a promising strategy for the development of a vaccine against Shigella.

GMMA and glycoconjugate approaches compared in mice for the development of a vaccine against shigella flexneri serotype 6

Raso M. M.;Cescutti P.;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Shigella infections are one of the top causes of diarrhea throughout the world, with Shigella flexneri being predominant in developing countries. Currently, no vaccines are widely available and increasing levels of multidrug-resistance make Shigella a high priority for vaccine development. The serotype-specific O-antigen moiety of Shigella lipopolysaccharide has been recognized as a key target for protective immunity, and many O-antigen based candidate vaccines are in development. Recently, the Generalized Modules for Membrane Antigens (GMMA) technology has been proposed as an alternative approach to traditional glycoconjugate vaccines for O-antigen delivery. Here, these two technologies are compared for a vaccine against S. flexneri serotype 6. Genetic strategies for GMMA production, conjugation approaches for linkage of the O-antigen to CRM197 carrier protein, and a large panel of analytical methods for full vaccine characterization have been put in place. In a head-to-head immunogenicity study in mice, GMMA induced higher anti-O-antigen IgG than glycoconjugate administered without Alhydrogel. When formulated on Alhydrogel, GMMA and glycoconjugate elicited similar levels of persistent anti-O-antigen IgG with bactericidal activity. Glycoconjugates are a well-established bacterial vaccine approach, but can be costly, particularly when multicomponent preparations are required. With similar immunogenicity and a simpler manufacturing process, GMMA are a promising strategy for the development of a vaccine against Shigella.
2020
Pubblicato
https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/8/2/160
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
82 vaccines-08-00160.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: articolo
Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.82 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.82 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
vaccines-08-00160-s001.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Supplementary material
Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 487.15 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
487.15 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/2965395
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 15
  • Scopus 34
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 34
social impact