Floristic inventories are an essential part of basic and applied research in botany. Despite a long history in floristic investigations, they are still conducted following non-objective (preferential) sampling approaches. Accordingly, final outputs (i) are extremely variable in the quality and quantity of collected data, (ii) are fully dependent on the researcher ability, and (iii) miss any possibility to perform statistical analyses. The aim of this work is to explore the drafting of a floristic inventory by means of probabilistic approaches, based on geostatistical designs aimed to locate samplings units (plots) in the study area. We planned, carried out and then compared two different sampling strategies: (i) ‘basic strategy’, a stratified random sampling design based solely on a spatial optimization criterion (no prior information is available), and (ii) ‘advanced strategy’, a sampling design based on the maximisation of the spectral heterogeneity among sampling units, quantified in terms of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index values (NDVI). The strategy that maximises collected floristic information was assessed based on a combination of descriptive and quantitative statistics, such as the completeness of the floristic inventory, the steepness of the rarefaction curves, the sampling time effort, and the plot contribution to the total β diversity. The 'advanced strategy' detected more species than the 'basic strategy' in all the sampling sites. Again, the rarefaction curve obtained with 'advanced strategy' is steeper in accumulating species in respect to the 'basic strategy'. The analysis of the contribution of each plot to the total β diversity showed that the 'advanced strategy' selects sampling units having a more homogeneously distributed contribution among plots, and that they are better spatially arranged across the study area to capture environmental peculiarities of sampling sites. Accordingly, the 'advanced strategy' is more effective than the 'basic' one in drafting a species inventory, in the face of just a little more effort in the design of the sampling strategy. The algorithm proposed to perform the 'advanced strategy', proposed here for the first time, can be profitably and freely applied to every geographic location and vegetation context.

More species, less effort: designing and comparing sampling strategies to draft optimised floristic inventories

Giovanni Bacaro;Enrico Tordoni;
2020-01-01

Abstract

Floristic inventories are an essential part of basic and applied research in botany. Despite a long history in floristic investigations, they are still conducted following non-objective (preferential) sampling approaches. Accordingly, final outputs (i) are extremely variable in the quality and quantity of collected data, (ii) are fully dependent on the researcher ability, and (iii) miss any possibility to perform statistical analyses. The aim of this work is to explore the drafting of a floristic inventory by means of probabilistic approaches, based on geostatistical designs aimed to locate samplings units (plots) in the study area. We planned, carried out and then compared two different sampling strategies: (i) ‘basic strategy’, a stratified random sampling design based solely on a spatial optimization criterion (no prior information is available), and (ii) ‘advanced strategy’, a sampling design based on the maximisation of the spectral heterogeneity among sampling units, quantified in terms of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index values (NDVI). The strategy that maximises collected floristic information was assessed based on a combination of descriptive and quantitative statistics, such as the completeness of the floristic inventory, the steepness of the rarefaction curves, the sampling time effort, and the plot contribution to the total β diversity. The 'advanced strategy' detected more species than the 'basic strategy' in all the sampling sites. Again, the rarefaction curve obtained with 'advanced strategy' is steeper in accumulating species in respect to the 'basic strategy'. The analysis of the contribution of each plot to the total β diversity showed that the 'advanced strategy' selects sampling units having a more homogeneously distributed contribution among plots, and that they are better spatially arranged across the study area to capture environmental peculiarities of sampling sites. Accordingly, the 'advanced strategy' is more effective than the 'basic' one in drafting a species inventory, in the face of just a little more effort in the design of the sampling strategy. The algorithm proposed to perform the 'advanced strategy', proposed here for the first time, can be profitably and freely applied to every geographic location and vegetation context.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
1-s2.0-S143383192030038X-main.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Copyright Editore
Dimensione 2.17 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.17 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
1-s2.0-S143383192030038X-mmc2.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Descrizione: part of supplementary material. other material at link:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S143383192030038X
Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Copyright Editore
Dimensione 1.13 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.13 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Bacaro.pdf

Open Access dal 01/06/2021

Tipologia: Bozza finale post-referaggio (post-print)
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 2.64 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.64 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
11368_2966455_print.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Bozza finale post-referaggio (post-print)
Licenza: Digital Rights Management non definito
Dimensione 2.56 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.56 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/2966455
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 13
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact