ArTS Archivio della ricerca di Trieste
ArTS è il sistema di gestione integrata dei dati della ricerca adottato dall' Università degli Studi di Trieste
EnglishObjectives: In the past literature agreed on treating oral carcinomas, using an “en-bloc” resection (EBR) but recently minimally invasive transoral surgery has spread as the preferable treatment for selected cases. This latter technique, which is performed with a discontinuous resection (DR), allows for a satisfactory postoperative quality of life (QoL) maintaining good survival rates. Materials and methods: In this study, we analyzed data about 147 surgically treated patients with oral cancer involving tongue and floor of the mouth. The sample was divided according to the surgical approach: EBR and DR group which were compared in terms of recurrence, overall survival, disease-free survival, and QoL. Results: In the DR group, survival analysis showed better results in term of survival, locoregional control, and postoperative anxiety, while the other QoL scores were similar in the two groups. Conclusion: The more invasive approach does not correlate to a better outcome. In selected cases, DR is an oncologically safe technique; EBR is still a valid option to treat advanced oral cancers.
| Titolo: | Surgical resection of oral cancer: en-bloc versus discontinuous approach |
| Autori: | |
| Data di pubblicazione: | 2020 |
| Stato di pubblicazione: | Pubblicato |
| Rivista: | |
| Abstract: | Objectives: In the past literature agreed on treating oral carcinomas, using an “en-bloc” resection (EBR) but recently minimally invasive transoral surgery has spread as the preferable treatment for selected cases. This latter technique, which is performed with a discontinuous resection (DR), allows for a satisfactory postoperative quality of life (QoL) maintaining good survival rates. Materials and methods: In this study, we analyzed data about 147 surgically treated patients with oral cancer involving tongue and floor of the mouth. The sample was divided according to the surgical approach: EBR and DR group which were compared in terms of recurrence, overall survival, disease-free survival, and QoL. Results: In the DR group, survival analysis showed better results in term of survival, locoregional control, and postoperative anxiety, while the other QoL scores were similar in the two groups. Conclusion: The more invasive approach does not correlate to a better outcome. In selected cases, DR is an oncologically safe technique; EBR is still a valid option to treat advanced oral cancers. |
| Handle: | http://hdl.handle.net/11368/2972139 |
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI): | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06016-5 |
| URL: | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00405-020-06016-5 |
| Appare nelle tipologie: | 1.1 Articolo in Rivista |
File in questo prodotto:
| File | Descrizione | Tipologia | Licenza | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tirelli2020_Article_SurgicalResectionOfOralCancerE.pdf | Documento in Versione Editoriale | Copyright Editore | Administrator Richiedi una copia |
