Are robots capable of forming concepts? The problem can be addressed starting from a similar question, namely that relating to the possibility that ani-mals are recognized as capable of forming concepts. Different positions have been addressed on this issue. A profitable possibility of analysis is offered by Davidson’s skeptical position in his influential Rational Animals. I examine some of the objec-tions made to the position that denies that animals can form concepts. I affirm that none of these are conclusive and I draw the idea that if the ability to form concepts must be recognized to animals, then the same position must also be supported with respect to robots.
MACCHINE LEIBNIZIANE
PIERPAOLO MARRONE
2020-01-01
Abstract
Are robots capable of forming concepts? The problem can be addressed starting from a similar question, namely that relating to the possibility that ani-mals are recognized as capable of forming concepts. Different positions have been addressed on this issue. A profitable possibility of analysis is offered by Davidson’s skeptical position in his influential Rational Animals. I examine some of the objec-tions made to the position that denies that animals can form concepts. I affirm that none of these are conclusive and I draw the idea that if the ability to form concepts must be recognized to animals, then the same position must also be supported with respect to robots.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
document.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
114.28 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
114.28 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


