In this paper the authors draw some far-reaching consequences from their recent books on political disintermediation and media populism. Firstly, they criticize the myth of disintermediation: the alleged direct relationship between “the people” and its populist representatives. Then, they replace the myth of disintermediation with an analysis of populist neo-intermediation: the replacement of traditional political mediators with the media. Finally, the authors compare this second notion with that of direct representation proposed by Nadia Urbinati.

La neo-intermediazione populista. Popolo, istituzioni, media

Barberis Mauro
;
2020-01-01

Abstract

In this paper the authors draw some far-reaching consequences from their recent books on political disintermediation and media populism. Firstly, they criticize the myth of disintermediation: the alleged direct relationship between “the people” and its populist representatives. Then, they replace the myth of disintermediation with an analysis of populist neo-intermediation: the replacement of traditional political mediators with the media. Finally, the authors compare this second notion with that of direct representation proposed by Nadia Urbinati.
2020
Pubblicato
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
neo-intermediazione.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Digital Rights Management non definito
Dimensione 316.94 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
316.94 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/2978909
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact