In this paper the authors draw some far-reaching consequences from their recent books on political disintermediation and media populism. Firstly, they criticize the myth of disintermediation: the alleged direct relationship between “the people” and its populist representatives. Then, they replace the myth of disintermediation with an analysis of populist neo-intermediation: the replacement of traditional political mediators with the media. Finally, the authors compare this second notion with that of direct representation proposed by Nadia Urbinati.
La neo-intermediazione populista. Popolo, istituzioni, media
Barberis Mauro
;
2020-01-01
Abstract
In this paper the authors draw some far-reaching consequences from their recent books on political disintermediation and media populism. Firstly, they criticize the myth of disintermediation: the alleged direct relationship between “the people” and its populist representatives. Then, they replace the myth of disintermediation with an analysis of populist neo-intermediation: the replacement of traditional political mediators with the media. Finally, the authors compare this second notion with that of direct representation proposed by Nadia Urbinati.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
neo-intermediazione.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Digital Rights Management non definito
Dimensione
316.94 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
316.94 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


