The article focuses on the adoption of naturalized epistemology as a framework for the relative plausibility theory developed by Ron Allen. It questions both the distinctness of Allen’s way of theorizing from a common version of conceptual analysis and the compliance of relative plausibility theory with the “naturalistic” methodological requirement expressed by the “Results Continuity” thesis.
Strong, Weak, or Apparent Naturalization? Relative Plausibility Theory and Conceptual Analysis
Muffato
2021-01-01
Abstract
The article focuses on the adoption of naturalized epistemology as a framework for the relative plausibility theory developed by Ron Allen. It questions both the distinctness of Allen’s way of theorizing from a common version of conceptual analysis and the compliance of relative plausibility theory with the “naturalistic” methodological requirement expressed by the “Results Continuity” thesis.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
strong, weak, apparent naturalism.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: articolo
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
92.32 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
92.32 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
