Mozambique’s donor-inspired ongoing programme of ‘traditional authorities’‘(re-)integration’ carries considerable emancipatory potential for local communities in their relations with central political institutions and the globalized economy. By analysing ‘traditional authorities’’specifically elaborated discourse and highlighting their agency within the dynamics emerging from state institutions’attempts at ‘incorporating’ them in the sense indicated by Zenker and Hoehne, that is, to deny them all political autonomy, this article aims to clarify ‘traditional’ leaders’ role in defending their own communities’ interests and rights vis-à-vis the state, private enterprises, and development actors/donors. Close examination of empirical data collected during field research in Inhambane province provides convincing evidence of 'traditional authorities’' general inability to develop effective discursive strategies for the representation and defence of their communities’ interests and rights. By choosing to retreat within the domain of spirituality and to cede much of their statutory prerogatives to more dynamic and better resourced actors, ‘traditional authorities’ end up accepting their ‘incorporation’ into the institutional structure of the state as merely symbolic objects and sources of internal as well as international legitimacy, thus obliterating their role as natural representatives of their communities.

‘Traditional Authorities’ and Community Rights in Contemporary Mozambique: between Activism and Incorporation

Giovanni Battista Martino
2021-01-01

Abstract

Mozambique’s donor-inspired ongoing programme of ‘traditional authorities’‘(re-)integration’ carries considerable emancipatory potential for local communities in their relations with central political institutions and the globalized economy. By analysing ‘traditional authorities’’specifically elaborated discourse and highlighting their agency within the dynamics emerging from state institutions’attempts at ‘incorporating’ them in the sense indicated by Zenker and Hoehne, that is, to deny them all political autonomy, this article aims to clarify ‘traditional’ leaders’ role in defending their own communities’ interests and rights vis-à-vis the state, private enterprises, and development actors/donors. Close examination of empirical data collected during field research in Inhambane province provides convincing evidence of 'traditional authorities’' general inability to develop effective discursive strategies for the representation and defence of their communities’ interests and rights. By choosing to retreat within the domain of spirituality and to cede much of their statutory prerogatives to more dynamic and better resourced actors, ‘traditional authorities’ end up accepting their ‘incorporation’ into the institutional structure of the state as merely symbolic objects and sources of internal as well as international legitimacy, thus obliterating their role as natural representatives of their communities.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
13280-Final Document (PDF)-60832-1-10-20211013.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Copyright Editore
Dimensione 297.23 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
297.23 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/2996955
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact