In this paper, a storage time prediction of pork using Computational Intelligence (CI) model was reported. We investigated a solution based on traditional pork assessment towards a low time-cost parameters acquisition and high accurate CI models by selection of appropriate parameters. The models investigated were built by J48, Naive Bayes (NB), k-NN, Random Forest (RF), SVM, MLP and Fuzzy approaches. CI input were traditional quality parameters, including pH, water holding capacity (WHC), color and lipid oxidation extracted from 250 samples of 0, 7 and 14 days of postmortem. Five parameters (pH, WHC, L*, a* and b*) were found superior results to determine the storage time and corroborate with identification in minutes. Results showed RF (94.41%), 3-NN (93.57%), Fuzzy Chi (93.23%), Fuzzy W (92.35%), MLP (88.35%), J48 (83.64%), SVM (82.03%) and NB (78.26%) were modeled by the five parameters. One important observation is about the ease of 0-day identification, followed by 14-day and 7-day independently of CI approach. Result of this paper offers the potential of CI for implementation in real scenarios, inclusive for fraud detection and pork quality assessment based on a non-destructive, fast, accurate analysis of the storage time. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Storage time prediction of pork by Computational Intelligence
Barbon Junior S;
2016-01-01
Abstract
In this paper, a storage time prediction of pork using Computational Intelligence (CI) model was reported. We investigated a solution based on traditional pork assessment towards a low time-cost parameters acquisition and high accurate CI models by selection of appropriate parameters. The models investigated were built by J48, Naive Bayes (NB), k-NN, Random Forest (RF), SVM, MLP and Fuzzy approaches. CI input were traditional quality parameters, including pH, water holding capacity (WHC), color and lipid oxidation extracted from 250 samples of 0, 7 and 14 days of postmortem. Five parameters (pH, WHC, L*, a* and b*) were found superior results to determine the storage time and corroborate with identification in minutes. Results showed RF (94.41%), 3-NN (93.57%), Fuzzy Chi (93.23%), Fuzzy W (92.35%), MLP (88.35%), J48 (83.64%), SVM (82.03%) and NB (78.26%) were modeled by the five parameters. One important observation is about the ease of 0-day identification, followed by 14-day and 7-day independently of CI approach. Result of this paper offers the potential of CI for implementation in real scenarios, inclusive for fraud detection and pork quality assessment based on a non-destructive, fast, accurate analysis of the storage time. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.