Meat classification methods are commonly based on quality parameters standardized by numeric ranges. However, some animal samples from different production chains do not match the current grades proposed. These unclassifiable samples are not capable to fit into a standard created by crisp range of values due to being infeasible toward its definition. An alternative to handle this kind of sample classification is the fuzzy logic, which could deal with uncertainty and ambiguity degree like human reasoning. In this work, we compare the traditional classification method and fuzzy approaches with the objective to handle the infeasible samples. This was compared to traditional pork standards using eleven real-life datasets with a total of 1798 samples described by pH, water holding capacity and/or L* value. The results demonstrated that traditional classification could not predict the unclassifiable samples. On the other hand, the fuzzy approaches improve significantly the number of classified samples. Performance of the fuzzy approaches were compared with several machine learning algorithms, but no significant statistical difference was observed. Finally, a real-life study case was explored, highlighting some advantages and further achievements of the fuzzy modeling.
Fuzzy approach for classification of pork into quality grades: coping with unclassifiable samples
Barbon Junior S;
2018-01-01
Abstract
Meat classification methods are commonly based on quality parameters standardized by numeric ranges. However, some animal samples from different production chains do not match the current grades proposed. These unclassifiable samples are not capable to fit into a standard created by crisp range of values due to being infeasible toward its definition. An alternative to handle this kind of sample classification is the fuzzy logic, which could deal with uncertainty and ambiguity degree like human reasoning. In this work, we compare the traditional classification method and fuzzy approaches with the objective to handle the infeasible samples. This was compared to traditional pork standards using eleven real-life datasets with a total of 1798 samples described by pH, water holding capacity and/or L* value. The results demonstrated that traditional classification could not predict the unclassifiable samples. On the other hand, the fuzzy approaches improve significantly the number of classified samples. Performance of the fuzzy approaches were compared with several machine learning algorithms, but no significant statistical difference was observed. Finally, a real-life study case was explored, highlighting some advantages and further achievements of the fuzzy modeling.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1-s2.0-S0168169917310773-main.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Copyright Editore
Dimensione
624.3 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
624.3 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
|
3004511_1-s2.0-S0168169917310773-main-Post_print.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Bozza finale post-referaggio (post-print)
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.04 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.04 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


