Artificial intelligence (AI)-based applications exhibit the potential to improve the quality and efficiency of patient care in different fields, including cataract management. A systematic review of the different applications of AI-based software on all aspects of a cataract patient's management, from diagnosis to follow-up, was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All selected articles were analyzed to assess the level of evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 guidelines, and the quality of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Of the articles analyzed, 49 met the inclusion criteria. No data synthesis was possible for the heterogeneity of available data and the design of the available studies. The AI-driven diagnosis seemed to be comparable and, in selected cases, to even exceed the accuracy of experienced clinicians in classifying disease, supporting the operating room scheduling, and intraoperative and postoperative management of complications. Considering the heterogeneity of data analyzed, however, further randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy and safety of AI application in the management of cataract should be highly warranted. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Artificial intelligence applications and cataract management: A systematic review
Tognetto, Daniele;Giglio, Rosa
;Vinciguerra, Alex Lucia;Milan, Serena;
2022-01-01
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI)-based applications exhibit the potential to improve the quality and efficiency of patient care in different fields, including cataract management. A systematic review of the different applications of AI-based software on all aspects of a cataract patient's management, from diagnosis to follow-up, was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. All selected articles were analyzed to assess the level of evidence according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 guidelines, and the quality of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Of the articles analyzed, 49 met the inclusion criteria. No data synthesis was possible for the heterogeneity of available data and the design of the available studies. The AI-driven diagnosis seemed to be comparable and, in selected cases, to even exceed the accuracy of experienced clinicians in classifying disease, supporting the operating room scheduling, and intraoperative and postoperative management of complications. Considering the heterogeneity of data analyzed, however, further randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy and safety of AI application in the management of cataract should be highly warranted. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Artificial intelligence applications and cataract management A systematic review.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
766.26 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
766.26 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
1-s2.0-S0039625721001879-mmc2.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Altro materiale allegato
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
649.15 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
649.15 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
1-s2.0-S0039625721001879-mmc1.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Altro materiale allegato
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
458.8 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
458.8 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.