Background Estimation of the balance between subendocardial oxygen supply and demand could be a useful parameter to assess the risk of myocardial ischemia. Evaluation of the subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR, also known as Buckberg index) by invasive recording of left ventricular and aortic pressure curves represents a valid method to estimate the degree of myocardial perfusion relative to left ventricular workload. However, routine clinical use of this parameter requires its noninvasive estimation and the demonstration of its reliability. Methods and Results Arterial applanation tonometry allows a noninvasive estimation of SEVR as the ratio of the areas directly beneath the central aortic pressure curves obtained during diastole (myocardial oxygen supply) and during systole (myocardial oxygen demand). However, this "traditional" method does not account for the intra-ventricular diastolic pressure and proper allocation to systole and diastole of left ventricular isometric contraction and relaxation, respectively, resulting in an overestimation of the SEVR values. These issues are considered in the novel method for SEVR assessment tested in this study. SEVR values estimated with carotid tonometry by "traditional" and "new" method were compared with those evaluated invasively by cardiac catheterization. The "traditional" method provided significantly higher SEVR values than the reference invasive SEVR: average of differences +/- SD= 44 +/- 11% (limits of agreement: 23% - 65%). The noninvasive "new" method showed a much better agreement with the invasive determination of SEVR: average of differences +/- SD= 0 +/- 8% (limits of agreement: -15% to 16%). Conclusions Carotid applanation tonometry provides valid noninvasive SEVR values only when all the main factors determining myocardial supply and demand flow are considered.

Comparison Between Invasive and Noninvasive Methods to Estimate Subendocardial Oxygen Supply and Demand Imbalance

Salvi, Paolo
;
Baldi, Corrado;Grillo, Andrea;Rovina, Matteo;Simon, Giulia;Fabris, Bruno;Carretta, Renzo;
2021-01-01

Abstract

Background Estimation of the balance between subendocardial oxygen supply and demand could be a useful parameter to assess the risk of myocardial ischemia. Evaluation of the subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR, also known as Buckberg index) by invasive recording of left ventricular and aortic pressure curves represents a valid method to estimate the degree of myocardial perfusion relative to left ventricular workload. However, routine clinical use of this parameter requires its noninvasive estimation and the demonstration of its reliability. Methods and Results Arterial applanation tonometry allows a noninvasive estimation of SEVR as the ratio of the areas directly beneath the central aortic pressure curves obtained during diastole (myocardial oxygen supply) and during systole (myocardial oxygen demand). However, this "traditional" method does not account for the intra-ventricular diastolic pressure and proper allocation to systole and diastole of left ventricular isometric contraction and relaxation, respectively, resulting in an overestimation of the SEVR values. These issues are considered in the novel method for SEVR assessment tested in this study. SEVR values estimated with carotid tonometry by "traditional" and "new" method were compared with those evaluated invasively by cardiac catheterization. The "traditional" method provided significantly higher SEVR values than the reference invasive SEVR: average of differences +/- SD= 44 +/- 11% (limits of agreement: 23% - 65%). The noninvasive "new" method showed a much better agreement with the invasive determination of SEVR: average of differences +/- SD= 0 +/- 8% (limits of agreement: -15% to 16%). Conclusions Carotid applanation tonometry provides valid noninvasive SEVR values only when all the main factors determining myocardial supply and demand flow are considered.
2021
Pubblicato
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.121.021207
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8649295/
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JAHA.121.021207.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.04 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.04 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
jah36630-sup-0001-figs1-s8.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 307.57 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
307.57 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3038199
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 3
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact