According to a standard formulation, alethic pluralism holds that there are many properties of truth. The position has been challenged to make sense of the traditional definition of logical validity, understood as a necessary truth preservation. The challenge consists of two problems: one, well known, posed by mixed inferences, and another, new, related to the unity of logical validity. In this paper, I argue that a pluralist semantics for compounded sentences, put forward by Douglas Edwards, can be used to overcome both difficulties.
VALIDITÀ LOGICA E PLURALISMO ALETICO: DUE PROBLEMI E UN’UNICA SOLUZIONE
STROLLO A
2022-01-01
Abstract
According to a standard formulation, alethic pluralism holds that there are many properties of truth. The position has been challenged to make sense of the traditional definition of logical validity, understood as a necessary truth preservation. The challenge consists of two problems: one, well known, posed by mixed inferences, and another, new, related to the unity of logical validity. In this paper, I argue that a pluralist semantics for compounded sentences, put forward by Douglas Edwards, can be used to overcome both difficulties.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Strollo Validità logica e pluralismo...pdf
Accesso chiuso
Descrizione: pdf contributo editoriale
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
4.51 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.51 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.