According to Naming and Necessity, proper names usually work referentially as rigid designators. In this paper, I argue that proper names have also attributive uses that systematically emerge in particular contexts. Attributive uses are then exploited to show that simple identity claims (such as “Hesperus is Phosphorus”) are open to a double interpretation. The main aim of the paper is arguing that the impression that certain true identities are a posteriori is mostly due to one of the two readings, a reading according to which, however, the expressed truth is only contingently true.
IF I WERE KRIPKE ... ATTRIBUTIVE NAMES AND THE NECESSARY A POSTERIORI
STROLLO A
2019-01-01
Abstract
According to Naming and Necessity, proper names usually work referentially as rigid designators. In this paper, I argue that proper names have also attributive uses that systematically emerge in particular contexts. Attributive uses are then exploited to show that simple identity claims (such as “Hesperus is Phosphorus”) are open to a double interpretation. The main aim of the paper is arguing that the impression that certain true identities are a posteriori is mostly due to one of the two readings, a reading according to which, however, the expressed truth is only contingently true.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
STROLLO-Attributive.Names.2019.pdf
Accesso chiuso
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Copyright dell'editore
Dimensione
201.88 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
201.88 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.