Gene expression analysis is pivotal in cancer research and clinical practice. While traditional methods lack spatial context, RNA in situ hybridization (RNA-ISH) is a powerful technique that retains spatial tissue information. Here, RNAscope score, RT-droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR), and automated QuantISH and QuPath were employed for quantifying RNA-ISH expression values from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. The methods were compared using high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma samples, focusing on CCNE1, WFDC2, and PPIB genes. The findings demonstrate good concordance between automated methods and RNAscope, with RT-ddPCR showing less concordance. Additionally, QuantISH exhibits robust performance, even for low-expressed genes like CCNE1, showcasing its modular design and enhancing accessibility as a viable alternative for gene expression analysis.
Comparative Analysis of Gene Expression Analysis Methods for RNA In Situ Hybridization Images
Azzalini E.;Canzonieri V.;Bonin S.
2024-01-01
Abstract
Gene expression analysis is pivotal in cancer research and clinical practice. While traditional methods lack spatial context, RNA in situ hybridization (RNA-ISH) is a powerful technique that retains spatial tissue information. Here, RNAscope score, RT-droplet digital PCR (RT-ddPCR), and automated QuantISH and QuPath were employed for quantifying RNA-ISH expression values from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. The methods were compared using high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma samples, focusing on CCNE1, WFDC2, and PPIB genes. The findings demonstrate good concordance between automated methods and RNAscope, with RT-ddPCR showing less concordance. Additionally, QuantISH exhibits robust performance, even for low-expressed genes like CCNE1, showcasing its modular design and enhancing accessibility as a viable alternative for gene expression analysis.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
