Aims: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may induce left ventricular (LV) reverse remodelling (=LV response) in patients with heart failure. Intraventricular pressure gradients can be quantified using echocardiography-derived haemodynamic forces (HDF). The aim was to evaluate the association between baseline HDF and LV response and to compare the change of HDF after CRT between LV responders and LV non-responders. Methods and results: The following HDF parameters were assessed: 1)apical-basal (AB) strength, 2)lateral-septal strength, 3)force vector angle, 4)systolic AB impulse, 5)systolic force vector angle. LV response was defined as a reduction of LV end-systolic volume ≥15% at six months. One hundred ninety-six patients were included (64±11 years, 122(62%) men), 136(69%) showed LV response. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, the force vector angle in the complete heart cycle (OR 1.083 (95%CI 1.018, 1.153), p=0.012) and the systolic force vector angle (OR 1.089 (95%CI 1.021, 1.161), p=0.009), both included in separate models, were independently associated with LV response. Six months after CRT, LV responders had greater AB strength, AB impulse and higher force vector angles, while LV non-responders only showed improvement in the force vector angle in the complete heart cycle. Conclusion: The orientation of HDF at baseline is associated with LV response to CRT. Six months after CRT, the orientation of HDF improves in LV responders and LV non-responders, while the magnitude of AB HDF only improves in LV responders.

Association between echocardiography-derived haemodynamic force parameters and left ventricular reverse remodelling after cardiac resynchronization therapy

Gianni Pedrizzetti;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Aims: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) may induce left ventricular (LV) reverse remodelling (=LV response) in patients with heart failure. Intraventricular pressure gradients can be quantified using echocardiography-derived haemodynamic forces (HDF). The aim was to evaluate the association between baseline HDF and LV response and to compare the change of HDF after CRT between LV responders and LV non-responders. Methods and results: The following HDF parameters were assessed: 1)apical-basal (AB) strength, 2)lateral-septal strength, 3)force vector angle, 4)systolic AB impulse, 5)systolic force vector angle. LV response was defined as a reduction of LV end-systolic volume ≥15% at six months. One hundred ninety-six patients were included (64±11 years, 122(62%) men), 136(69%) showed LV response. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, the force vector angle in the complete heart cycle (OR 1.083 (95%CI 1.018, 1.153), p=0.012) and the systolic force vector angle (OR 1.089 (95%CI 1.021, 1.161), p=0.009), both included in separate models, were independently associated with LV response. Six months after CRT, LV responders had greater AB strength, AB impulse and higher force vector angles, while LV non-responders only showed improvement in the force vector angle in the complete heart cycle. Conclusion: The orientation of HDF at baseline is associated with LV response to CRT. Six months after CRT, the orientation of HDF improves in LV responders and LV non-responders, while the magnitude of AB HDF only improves in LV responders.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
jeae181.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.58 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.58 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3096393
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact