Aims Assessment of intracardiac flow dynamics has recently acquired significance due to the development of new measurement methods based on echocardiography. Recent studies have demonstrated that cardiac abnormalities are associated with changes in intracardiac vortical flows. Yet, no previous study assessed the impact of aortic stenosis (AS) on intracardiac vortices. This study aims to explore the clinical potential of additional information provided by quantifying intracardiac flow dynamics in patients with AS. Methods and results One hundred and twenty patients with severe AS, sixty patients with concentric ventricular remodelling (VR), and hundred controls (CTRL) were prospectively included and underwent non-invasive evaluation of intracardiac flow dynamics. In addition to standard echocardiography, fluid dynamics were assessed by means of HyperDoppler. Vortex depth (P < 0.001), vortex length (P = 0.003), vortex intensity (P < 0.001), and vortex area (P = 0.049) were significantly increased in AS compared with CTRL. In addition, mean energy dissipation was significantly higher in AS compared with CTRL (P < 0.001) and VR (P = 0.002). At receiver operating characteristic analysis, vortex depth showed the best discrimination capacity for AS (P < 0.001). Conclusion Changes in fluid dynamics-based HyperDoppler indices can be reliably assessed in patients with AS. Significant changes in vortex depth and intensity can selectively differentiate AS from both concentric remodelling and healthy CTRLs, suggesting that the assessment of intracardiac flow dynamics may provide complementary information to standard echocardiography to better characterize patients' subsets.

Changes of intracardiac flow dynamics measured by HyperDoppler in patients with aortic stenosis

Pedrizzetti G.;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Aims Assessment of intracardiac flow dynamics has recently acquired significance due to the development of new measurement methods based on echocardiography. Recent studies have demonstrated that cardiac abnormalities are associated with changes in intracardiac vortical flows. Yet, no previous study assessed the impact of aortic stenosis (AS) on intracardiac vortices. This study aims to explore the clinical potential of additional information provided by quantifying intracardiac flow dynamics in patients with AS. Methods and results One hundred and twenty patients with severe AS, sixty patients with concentric ventricular remodelling (VR), and hundred controls (CTRL) were prospectively included and underwent non-invasive evaluation of intracardiac flow dynamics. In addition to standard echocardiography, fluid dynamics were assessed by means of HyperDoppler. Vortex depth (P < 0.001), vortex length (P = 0.003), vortex intensity (P < 0.001), and vortex area (P = 0.049) were significantly increased in AS compared with CTRL. In addition, mean energy dissipation was significantly higher in AS compared with CTRL (P < 0.001) and VR (P = 0.002). At receiver operating characteristic analysis, vortex depth showed the best discrimination capacity for AS (P < 0.001). Conclusion Changes in fluid dynamics-based HyperDoppler indices can be reliably assessed in patients with AS. Significant changes in vortex depth and intensity can selectively differentiate AS from both concentric remodelling and healthy CTRLs, suggesting that the assessment of intracardiac flow dynamics may provide complementary information to standard echocardiography to better characterize patients' subsets.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
oeae069.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 636.99 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
636.99 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3096394
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact