Background and aim: Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis (FPF) is an emerging group of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) caused by mutations mainly involving "telomere-related genes" and "surfactant-related genes". Although, in 2023, European Respiratory Society proposed a statement for FPFs management, these still remain a burden. Our work aimed to evaluate the management and impact of FPF in three Italian different medical settings: University Hospitals (UHs), non-University Hospitals (N-UHs) and outpatient clinics. Methods: This survey was created by ILDs Study Group Società Italiana di Pneumologia/ Italian Respiratory Society (SIP-IRS) and diffused via email to all SIP-IRS members. The descriptive statistical analysis was conducted through GraphPad Prism software (version 8.0).  Results: Twenty participants replied to the survey, of which 65% (13/20) worked at UH while the remaining 25% (6/20) and 5% (1/20) worked at N-UH and outpatient clinics, respectively. Centers with, at least, 150 ILD patients visits/year followed a higher number of FPF patients, regardless of University affiliation (p=0.0046). Despite significant discrepancies in genetic testing and availability of counselling were registered, no statistically significant differences in patients' anamnesis assessment were observed between UHs and N-UHs (p=0.4192 and p=0.6525). However, there were relevant differences in the number of FPF patients undergoing genetic assessment in the Centers with Genetics Lab or Unit inside the Hospital (p=0.0253). There was no consensus regarding the impact of FPF diagnosis on lung transplantation and screening of asymptomatic relatives. Similarly, no differences were reported in antifibrotic prescriptions between UHs and N-UHs. Although the typical UIP pattern was the most common radiological pattern observed in FPF patients, there were no differences in the prevalence of histopathological patterns between UH and N-UH. Conclusions: Improving pulmonologists' knowledge of the approach, diagnosis and management of FPF is a global medical topic. Scientific societies can provide significant support in raising physicians' awareness of this issue.

The management of Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis in different medical settings: Where does that leave us? An Italian nationwide survey / Monteleone, G.; Bergantini, L.; D'Alessandro, M.; Pianigiani, T.; Simonetti, J.; Iovene, B.; Varone, F.; Sgalla, G.; Richeldi, L.; Bargagli, E.; Cameli, P.; Ruaro, B.; Bocchino, M. L.; Baratella, E.; Tirelli, C.; Sofia, C.; Deidda, S.; ILDs Study Group, Sip/irs. - In: SARCOIDOSIS VASCULITIS AND DIFFUSE LUNG DISEASES. - ISSN 2532-179X. - ELETTRONICO. - 41:3(2024), pp. e2024047."-"-e2024047."-". [10.36141/svdld.v41i3.15744]

The management of Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis in different medical settings: Where does that leave us? An Italian nationwide survey

D'Alessandro M.;Ruaro B.
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Baratella E.
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Background and aim: Familial Pulmonary Fibrosis (FPF) is an emerging group of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) caused by mutations mainly involving "telomere-related genes" and "surfactant-related genes". Although, in 2023, European Respiratory Society proposed a statement for FPFs management, these still remain a burden. Our work aimed to evaluate the management and impact of FPF in three Italian different medical settings: University Hospitals (UHs), non-University Hospitals (N-UHs) and outpatient clinics. Methods: This survey was created by ILDs Study Group Società Italiana di Pneumologia/ Italian Respiratory Society (SIP-IRS) and diffused via email to all SIP-IRS members. The descriptive statistical analysis was conducted through GraphPad Prism software (version 8.0).  Results: Twenty participants replied to the survey, of which 65% (13/20) worked at UH while the remaining 25% (6/20) and 5% (1/20) worked at N-UH and outpatient clinics, respectively. Centers with, at least, 150 ILD patients visits/year followed a higher number of FPF patients, regardless of University affiliation (p=0.0046). Despite significant discrepancies in genetic testing and availability of counselling were registered, no statistically significant differences in patients' anamnesis assessment were observed between UHs and N-UHs (p=0.4192 and p=0.6525). However, there were relevant differences in the number of FPF patients undergoing genetic assessment in the Centers with Genetics Lab or Unit inside the Hospital (p=0.0253). There was no consensus regarding the impact of FPF diagnosis on lung transplantation and screening of asymptomatic relatives. Similarly, no differences were reported in antifibrotic prescriptions between UHs and N-UHs. Although the typical UIP pattern was the most common radiological pattern observed in FPF patients, there were no differences in the prevalence of histopathological patterns between UH and N-UH. Conclusions: Improving pulmonologists' knowledge of the approach, diagnosis and management of FPF is a global medical topic. Scientific societies can provide significant support in raising physicians' awareness of this issue.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
SVDLD-41-47 articolo monteleone SIP.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.16 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.16 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3104078
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 13
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact