Electrocatalytic hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production presents a promising alternative to conventional synthesis methods, such as the anthraquinone process. It utilizes electrocatalysts to selectively reduce oxygen through a two-electron transfer (ORR-2e-) mechanism. However, designing affordable, selective, and stable catalytic materials is challenging, as they face degradation under reaction conditions. To evaluate the long-term performance and reliability of electrocatalysts, accelerated stress tests (ASTs) are commonly employed to simulate and understand the catalyst’s degradation pathways in a shorter time. For the electrosynthesis of H2O2, however, a standardized approach is notably absent, and there is a dearth of comparative analysis across various catalyst classes. In this study, we have designed and tested three distinct AST protocols to investigate the deactivation processes involved during the electrocatalytic H2O2 production in acidic media. We assessed the performance of four leading catalysts, each exhibiting over 90% selectivity. These included palladium single atoms, gold and palladium nanoparticles, and cobalt nanoparticles encapsulated in carbon, all supported on high surface area carbon. Our investigation revealed substantial variations in stability, contingent upon the specific material and the applied degradation protocol. This approach enables a comprehensive understanding and evaluation of the stability of electrocatalysts as well as facilitates the development of more continuous and cost-effective H2O2 production routes.

Benchmarking the Stability of State-of-the-Art H2O2 Electrocatalysts under Acidic Conditions

Melchionna, Michele;Fornasiero, Paolo;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Electrocatalytic hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production presents a promising alternative to conventional synthesis methods, such as the anthraquinone process. It utilizes electrocatalysts to selectively reduce oxygen through a two-electron transfer (ORR-2e-) mechanism. However, designing affordable, selective, and stable catalytic materials is challenging, as they face degradation under reaction conditions. To evaluate the long-term performance and reliability of electrocatalysts, accelerated stress tests (ASTs) are commonly employed to simulate and understand the catalyst’s degradation pathways in a shorter time. For the electrosynthesis of H2O2, however, a standardized approach is notably absent, and there is a dearth of comparative analysis across various catalyst classes. In this study, we have designed and tested three distinct AST protocols to investigate the deactivation processes involved during the electrocatalytic H2O2 production in acidic media. We assessed the performance of four leading catalysts, each exhibiting over 90% selectivity. These included palladium single atoms, gold and palladium nanoparticles, and cobalt nanoparticles encapsulated in carbon, all supported on high surface area carbon. Our investigation revealed substantial variations in stability, contingent upon the specific material and the applied degradation protocol. This approach enables a comprehensive understanding and evaluation of the stability of electrocatalysts as well as facilitates the development of more continuous and cost-effective H2O2 production routes.
2025
10-mag-2025
Pubblicato
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
fortunato-et-al-2025-benchmarking-the-stability-of-state-of-the-art-h2o2-electrocatalysts-under-acidic-conditions.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 4.32 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.32 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
cs5c00868_si_001.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: Supporting material
Tipologia: Altro materiale allegato
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.31 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.31 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3110998
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact