Underground Hydrogen Storage (UHS) is a promising solution to maximize the use of hydrogen as an energy carrier. This study presents a standardized methodology for assessing UHS quality by introducing the Underground Hydrogen Storage Suitability Index (UHSSI), which integrates three sub-indices: the Caprock Potential Index (CPI), the Reservoir Quality Index (RQI), and the Site Potential Index (SPI). Parameters such as porosity, permeability, lithology, caprock thickness, depth, temperature, and salinity are evaluated and ranked from 0 (unsuitable) to 5 (excellent). The methodology was validated using data from six worldwide sites, including salt caverns and aquifers. Sites like Moss Bluff, Clemens Dome, and Spindletop (USA) scored highly, while Teesside (UK), Lobodice (Czech Republic), and Beynes (France) were classified as unsuitable due to shallow depths and microbial activity. A software tool, the UHSSI Calculator, was developed to automate site evaluations. This approach offers a cost-effective tool for preliminary screening and supports the safer development of UHS.

Underground hydrogen storage suitability index: A geological tool for evaluating and ranking storage sites

Borghini, Lorenzo
Primo
Writing – Original Draft Preparation
;
Corradetti, Amerigo
Secondo
Writing – Review & Editing
;
Del Ben, Anna
Writing – Review & Editing
;
Franceschi, Marco
Penultimo
Writing – Review & Editing
;
Bonini, Lorenzo
Ultimo
Writing – Review & Editing
2025-01-01

Abstract

Underground Hydrogen Storage (UHS) is a promising solution to maximize the use of hydrogen as an energy carrier. This study presents a standardized methodology for assessing UHS quality by introducing the Underground Hydrogen Storage Suitability Index (UHSSI), which integrates three sub-indices: the Caprock Potential Index (CPI), the Reservoir Quality Index (RQI), and the Site Potential Index (SPI). Parameters such as porosity, permeability, lithology, caprock thickness, depth, temperature, and salinity are evaluated and ranked from 0 (unsuitable) to 5 (excellent). The methodology was validated using data from six worldwide sites, including salt caverns and aquifers. Sites like Moss Bluff, Clemens Dome, and Spindletop (USA) scored highly, while Teesside (UK), Lobodice (Czech Republic), and Beynes (France) were classified as unsuitable due to shallow depths and microbial activity. A software tool, the UHSSI Calculator, was developed to automate site evaluations. This approach offers a cost-effective tool for preliminary screening and supports the safer development of UHS.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3112740
 Avviso

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 1
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact