Background: Bowel preparation for colonoscopy causes significant discomfort to patients. Large volumes, unpleasant taste, and split-dosing are the main disadvantages of most laxatives. Oral mannitol could be an attractive option because it acts quickly, requires low volumes, and has a pleasant taste. Aims: A Phase III study (SATISFACTION) compared oral mannitol with polyethylene glycol-ascorbate (PEG-ADC). This post hoc analysis investigated the effects on patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), mainly concerning the perception of using the preparations. Methods: The SATISFACTION Phase III study was an international, multicenter, randomized (1:1), parallel-group, endoscopist-blinded, non-inferiority trial. Taste of preparations, ease of use, and willingness to repeat the preparation with the same product were scored and assessed by the patients. Results: Bowel preparation with oral mannitol resulted in a better patient satisfaction profile for all PROMs evaluated. Conclusion: Oral mannitol for bowel preparation achieved high patient satisfaction and might be a valuable option for colonoscopy. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04759885).

Assessment of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Patients Undergoing Bowel Preparation With Mannitol for Colonoscopy: The SATISFACTION Study

Cannizzaro, Renato
Writing – Review & Editing
;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background: Bowel preparation for colonoscopy causes significant discomfort to patients. Large volumes, unpleasant taste, and split-dosing are the main disadvantages of most laxatives. Oral mannitol could be an attractive option because it acts quickly, requires low volumes, and has a pleasant taste. Aims: A Phase III study (SATISFACTION) compared oral mannitol with polyethylene glycol-ascorbate (PEG-ADC). This post hoc analysis investigated the effects on patient-reported outcomes (PROMs), mainly concerning the perception of using the preparations. Methods: The SATISFACTION Phase III study was an international, multicenter, randomized (1:1), parallel-group, endoscopist-blinded, non-inferiority trial. Taste of preparations, ease of use, and willingness to repeat the preparation with the same product were scored and assessed by the patients. Results: Bowel preparation with oral mannitol resulted in a better patient satisfaction profile for all PROMs evaluated. Conclusion: Oral mannitol for bowel preparation achieved high patient satisfaction and might be a valuable option for colonoscopy. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04759885).
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
JGH Open - 2025 - Tontini - Assessment of Patient‐Reported Outcome Measures in Patients Undergoing Bowel Preparation With.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 1.05 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.05 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3114798
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact