Background/Objectives: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most common form of pulmonary fibrosis (PF) and serves as a key reference for disease severity. Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF), a distinct yet heterogeneous entity arising from various interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), shares similar pathogenetic mechanisms and clinical courses driven by self-perpetuating fibrosis. Antifibrotic therapy, notably nintedanib, can slow disease progression. However, real-world data on antifibrotic therapy’s impact on survival, especially in PPF, are limited. This study aims to compare IPF and PPF regarding phenotype, radiological patterns, comorbidities, prognostic factors, and response to nintedanib, focusing on identifying the patient subsets most likely to benefit. Outcomes assessed include safety, survival, and disease progression over one year, considering various prognostic factors. Methods: This retrospective observational study evaluated patients with fibrosing ILD, affected by either IPF or PPF, and treated with nintedanib. Data collected encompassed clinical, radiological, functional, and treatment-related information. Assessments included chest CT, pulmonary function tests, comorbidities, and survival analysis, utilizing standardized methods and statistical tools to interpret outcomes and tolerability. Results: The study population was composed of 97 patients: 64 were diagnosed with IPF and 33 with PPF. The analysis showed that in PPF patients, ongoing antifibrotic treatment resulted in higher survival (71.1 months vs. 27.4 months, p < 0.001), while no statistically significant differences were found in the IPF group (67.4 months vs. 52.5 months, p = 0.216). Nintedanib was generally well tolerated. Gastrointestinal side effects, predominantly diarrhea, were reported in 61% of patients with IPF and 50% of those with PPF. Dose reduction occurred in 43.75% of IPF patients and 36% of PPF patients, while treatment discontinuation was required in 21.87% of IPF and 21% of PPF patients. Conclusions: This study highlights that in PPF patients, antifibrotic therapy with nintedanib can improve survival. This statement underlines that the primary outcome of antifibrotic treatment should focus on improving patients’ survival.

Retrospective Observational Study of Nintedanib in Managing Idiopathic and Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis in Routine Practice

Andrisano, Alessia Giovanna
Primo
;
Patruno, Vincenzo;Reccardini, Nicolò;Confalonieri, Paola;Salton, Francesco;Confalonieri, Marco
Penultimo
;
Ruaro, Barbara
Ultimo
Conceptualization
2025-01-01

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most common form of pulmonary fibrosis (PF) and serves as a key reference for disease severity. Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF), a distinct yet heterogeneous entity arising from various interstitial lung diseases (ILDs), shares similar pathogenetic mechanisms and clinical courses driven by self-perpetuating fibrosis. Antifibrotic therapy, notably nintedanib, can slow disease progression. However, real-world data on antifibrotic therapy’s impact on survival, especially in PPF, are limited. This study aims to compare IPF and PPF regarding phenotype, radiological patterns, comorbidities, prognostic factors, and response to nintedanib, focusing on identifying the patient subsets most likely to benefit. Outcomes assessed include safety, survival, and disease progression over one year, considering various prognostic factors. Methods: This retrospective observational study evaluated patients with fibrosing ILD, affected by either IPF or PPF, and treated with nintedanib. Data collected encompassed clinical, radiological, functional, and treatment-related information. Assessments included chest CT, pulmonary function tests, comorbidities, and survival analysis, utilizing standardized methods and statistical tools to interpret outcomes and tolerability. Results: The study population was composed of 97 patients: 64 were diagnosed with IPF and 33 with PPF. The analysis showed that in PPF patients, ongoing antifibrotic treatment resulted in higher survival (71.1 months vs. 27.4 months, p < 0.001), while no statistically significant differences were found in the IPF group (67.4 months vs. 52.5 months, p = 0.216). Nintedanib was generally well tolerated. Gastrointestinal side effects, predominantly diarrhea, were reported in 61% of patients with IPF and 50% of those with PPF. Dose reduction occurred in 43.75% of IPF patients and 36% of PPF patients, while treatment discontinuation was required in 21.87% of IPF and 21% of PPF patients. Conclusions: This study highlights that in PPF patients, antifibrotic therapy with nintedanib can improve survival. This statement underlines that the primary outcome of antifibrotic treatment should focus on improving patients’ survival.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
jcm-14-06665 Andrisano.pdf

accesso aperto

Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Creative commons
Dimensione 984.3 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
984.3 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/3117740
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact