The paper investigates whether refrigerated diesel light commercial vehicles (D-LCVs) could be substituted by refrigerated electric LCVs (E-LCVs) or hydrogen LCVs (H2-LCVs), considering both their economic and logistics performances. The economic performance is evaluated via the total cost of ownership (TCO) methodology, while the logistics one is estimated via a multi-agent simulation model. If LCVs are operated in urban contexts, we find that both alternative powertrains exhibit operational parity versus D-LCVs, irrespective of the weather conditions. In terms of TCO, however, only E-LCVs are almost competitive with D-LCVs, while H2-LCVs are by far costlier. If LCVs are used to distribute refrigerated goods in regional contexts (with longer travel distances), ELCVs show lower logistical efficiency than D-LCVs under normal conditions, further exacerbated in extreme weather, although they have better TCO metrics. On the contrary, H2-LCVs achieved similar logistical efficiency than D-LCVs but continue to show very poor economics.
Economic and logistical performance of refrigerated electric and hydrogen light commercial vehicles. A total cost of ownership and hybrid simulation perspective / Danielis, Romeo; Niazi, Arsalan Muhammad Khan; Scorrano, Mariangela; Masutti, Manuela. - In: RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT. - ISSN 2210-5395. - STAMPA. - 66:(2026), pp. 101595.1-101595.14. [10.1016/j.rtbm.2026.101595]
Economic and logistical performance of refrigerated electric and hydrogen light commercial vehicles. A total cost of ownership and hybrid simulation perspective
Danielis, Romeo;Niazi, Arsalan Muhammad Khan;Scorrano, Mariangela
;Masutti, Manuela
2026-01-01
Abstract
The paper investigates whether refrigerated diesel light commercial vehicles (D-LCVs) could be substituted by refrigerated electric LCVs (E-LCVs) or hydrogen LCVs (H2-LCVs), considering both their economic and logistics performances. The economic performance is evaluated via the total cost of ownership (TCO) methodology, while the logistics one is estimated via a multi-agent simulation model. If LCVs are operated in urban contexts, we find that both alternative powertrains exhibit operational parity versus D-LCVs, irrespective of the weather conditions. In terms of TCO, however, only E-LCVs are almost competitive with D-LCVs, while H2-LCVs are by far costlier. If LCVs are used to distribute refrigerated goods in regional contexts (with longer travel distances), ELCVs show lower logistical efficiency than D-LCVs under normal conditions, further exacerbated in extreme weather, although they have better TCO metrics. On the contrary, H2-LCVs achieved similar logistical efficiency than D-LCVs but continue to show very poor economics.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
2026 - Danielis et al. - Economic and logistical performance of refrigerated electric and hydrogen LCV. A TCO and hybrid simulation perspective.pdf
accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo in rivista
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
4.44 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
4.44 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


