Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) is a common method for assessing saltwater intrusion in hydrogeological studies,but its application is often limited to small areas due to the need for physical contact with the ground, resulting in long dataacquisition times. In contrast, electromagnetic induction techniques (EMI) offer a promising alternative, but face ongoingdebates regarding the robustness and calibration of their data. This study compares data from two different FrequencyDomain Electromagnetic (FDEM) instruments - a multi-offset, constant frequency, constant induction number instrumentand a single-offset, multi-frequency, variable induction number instrument - with ERT surveys. The comparison was madeat four different sites of varying salinity and morphology, including both saline and freshwater aquifers. The results showthat FDEM is effective for mapping shallow salinity when ERT data are used for calibration. In fact, while the qualitativeconductivity trends obtained by FDEM are consistent, discrepancies in the range and values of electrical conductivitypersist between different FDEM instruments and when compared to ERT data. Calibrations achieved through statisticalanalysis of cross plots can correct these discrepancies, but remain site- and season-dependent. The study highlights thepotential of FDEM to detect seawater intrusion, even for long-distance profiles and 3-D spatial analysis, offering a faster,cost-effective alternative to traditional ERT approaches. The proposed technique is not limited to hydrogeological studiesas it can be easily extended to other applications and geological backgrounds.
Comparison of electrical resistivity tomography and frequency domain electromagnetic methods for mapping seawater intrusion in a shallow coastal aquifer (Northern Italy)
Surian, Benedetta;Forte, Emanuele;Zini, Luca
2026-01-01
Abstract
Electrical Resistivity Tomography (ERT) is a common method for assessing saltwater intrusion in hydrogeological studies,but its application is often limited to small areas due to the need for physical contact with the ground, resulting in long dataacquisition times. In contrast, electromagnetic induction techniques (EMI) offer a promising alternative, but face ongoingdebates regarding the robustness and calibration of their data. This study compares data from two different FrequencyDomain Electromagnetic (FDEM) instruments - a multi-offset, constant frequency, constant induction number instrumentand a single-offset, multi-frequency, variable induction number instrument - with ERT surveys. The comparison was madeat four different sites of varying salinity and morphology, including both saline and freshwater aquifers. The results showthat FDEM is effective for mapping shallow salinity when ERT data are used for calibration. In fact, while the qualitativeconductivity trends obtained by FDEM are consistent, discrepancies in the range and values of electrical conductivitypersist between different FDEM instruments and when compared to ERT data. Calibrations achieved through statisticalanalysis of cross plots can correct these discrepancies, but remain site- and season-dependent. The study highlights thepotential of FDEM to detect seawater intrusion, even for long-distance profiles and 3-D spatial analysis, offering a faster,cost-effective alternative to traditional ERT approaches. The proposed technique is not limited to hydrogeological studiesas it can be easily extended to other applications and geological backgrounds.Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


