Purpose of Review: Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in cardiomyopathies remains challenging because arrhythmic risk, drug efficacy, and pro-arrhythmic vulnerability vary substantially across phenotypes. This review summarizes contemporary guideline and consensus recommendations on antiarrhythmic drug use in hypertrophic, dilated, non-dilated left ventricular, and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies. Recent Findings: Recent guidelines increasingly emphasize phenotype-oriented arrhythmia management, but specific recommendations for antiarrhythmic drug therapy remain fragmented. Beta-blockers and amiodarone are the most consistently recommended agents in structural heart disease, whereas class I drugs are generally restricted. Evidence is strongest for hypertrophic and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies, while recommendations for dilated and non-dilated left ventricular cardiomyopathies are largely extrapolated from broader heart failure populations. Summary: Antiarrhythmic drugs are mainly used to reduce arrhythmic burden, symptoms, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies rather than to improve survival. Future studies should define phenotype-specific strategies based on ventricular function, myocardial scar, genotype, and clinical context.
Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Cardiomyopathies: A Comparative Synthesis of Guidelines and Consensus Documents / Palermi, A., Di Marco, M., Saraullo, S., Magnano, R., Pezzi, L., Rossi, D., Renda, G., Gallina, S., Sinagra, G., Merlo, M.. - In: CURRENT CARDIOLOGY REPORTS. - ISSN 1523-3782. - ELETTRONICO. - 28:1(2026), pp. 83."-"-83."-". [10.1007/s11886-026-02405-0]
Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Cardiomyopathies: A Comparative Synthesis of Guidelines and Consensus Documents
Sinagra, GianfrancoPenultimo
;Merlo, MarcoUltimo
2026-01-01
Abstract
Purpose of Review: Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in cardiomyopathies remains challenging because arrhythmic risk, drug efficacy, and pro-arrhythmic vulnerability vary substantially across phenotypes. This review summarizes contemporary guideline and consensus recommendations on antiarrhythmic drug use in hypertrophic, dilated, non-dilated left ventricular, and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies. Recent Findings: Recent guidelines increasingly emphasize phenotype-oriented arrhythmia management, but specific recommendations for antiarrhythmic drug therapy remain fragmented. Beta-blockers and amiodarone are the most consistently recommended agents in structural heart disease, whereas class I drugs are generally restricted. Evidence is strongest for hypertrophic and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies, while recommendations for dilated and non-dilated left ventricular cardiomyopathies are largely extrapolated from broader heart failure populations. Summary: Antiarrhythmic drugs are mainly used to reduce arrhythmic burden, symptoms, and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies rather than to improve survival. Future studies should define phenotype-specific strategies based on ventricular function, myocardial scar, genotype, and clinical context.| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
s11886-026-02405-0.pdf
accesso aperto
Tipologia:
Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza:
Creative commons
Dimensione
1.47 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
1.47 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Pubblicazioni consigliate
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.


