The presence of ictal eye closure (IEC) has been considered to represent an additional clinical sign supporting the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic events (PNEEs). We undertook a systematic review to evaluate sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios (LR) of IEC in the differential diagnosis between PNEEs and epileptic seizures. Six studies (total of 1496 events; 1021 epileptic seizures and 475 PNEEs) were included. Pooled accuracy measures of IEC for the diagnosis of PNEE were: sensitivity 58% (0.579) (95% CI 0.534-0.623), specificity 80% (0.895) (95% 0.875-0.9131)%, pLR 5.524 (95% CI 4.546-6.714) and nLR 0.47 (95% CI 0.422-0.524). However, a sensitivity analysis including only the studies performing an IEC assessment blinded to the diagnoses yielded results indicative of a rather low diagnostic value of IEC (pLR 3.056) compared with the analysis including unblinded studies (pLR 12.754). Further studies evaluating the occurrence of IEC through direct observation by means of video-EEG recording and blind to both EEG tracings and patient diagnosis are therefore required to definitely estimate the diagnostic utility of this sign in the differential diagnosis between epileptic seizures and PNEEs.

Clinical utility of ictal eyes closure in the differential diagnosis between epileptic seizures and psychogenic events.

MANGANOTTI, PAOLO;
2013

Abstract

The presence of ictal eye closure (IEC) has been considered to represent an additional clinical sign supporting the diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic events (PNEEs). We undertook a systematic review to evaluate sensitivity, specificity and likelihood ratios (LR) of IEC in the differential diagnosis between PNEEs and epileptic seizures. Six studies (total of 1496 events; 1021 epileptic seizures and 475 PNEEs) were included. Pooled accuracy measures of IEC for the diagnosis of PNEE were: sensitivity 58% (0.579) (95% CI 0.534-0.623), specificity 80% (0.895) (95% 0.875-0.9131)%, pLR 5.524 (95% CI 4.546-6.714) and nLR 0.47 (95% CI 0.422-0.524). However, a sensitivity analysis including only the studies performing an IEC assessment blinded to the diagnoses yielded results indicative of a rather low diagnostic value of IEC (pLR 3.056) compared with the analysis including unblinded studies (pLR 12.754). Further studies evaluating the occurrence of IEC through direct observation by means of video-EEG recording and blind to both EEG tracings and patient diagnosis are therefore required to definitely estimate the diagnostic utility of this sign in the differential diagnosis between epileptic seizures and PNEEs.
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: http://hdl.handle.net/11368/2833140
 Attenzione

Attenzione! I dati visualizzati non sono stati sottoposti a validazione da parte dell'ateneo

Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact