In the paper, the results of an experimental and numerical study on the out-of-plane bending effectiveness of a modern strengthening technique applied to existing masonry walls are presented. The technique consists in the application, on both wall faces, of a mortar coating reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) meshes. Four point bending tests of full scale masonry samples (1000 width, 3000 mm height) were carried out considering three types of masonry (solid brick, 250 mm thick, rubble stone and cobblestones, 400 mm thick). The performances of plain and reinforced specimens were analysed and compared. It emerged that strengthened specimens are able to resist out-of-plane bending moments almost 4–5 times greater than those of plain specimens; moreover they can overcome deflections more than 25 times higher, due to the presence of the GFRP mesh, which contrasts the opening of cracks. The cracking and the ultimate bending moments of reinforced samples can be analytically predicted using relationships quite close to those used in the design of reinforced concrete beams subjected to combined axial and bending actions. The results of nonlinear static analyses performed on a 2D numerical model were also presented, so to comprehend the mechanical behaviour of reinforced masonry walls. Their agreement with the experimental results proved the reliability of the simulations; moreover, the extension of the 2D model to a 3D one, necessary to analyze the behavior of perforated walls, was also made.

Out-of-plane behavior of reinforced masonry walls: Experimental and numerical study

GATTESCO, Natalino;BOEM, INGRID
2017-01-01

Abstract

In the paper, the results of an experimental and numerical study on the out-of-plane bending effectiveness of a modern strengthening technique applied to existing masonry walls are presented. The technique consists in the application, on both wall faces, of a mortar coating reinforced with glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP) meshes. Four point bending tests of full scale masonry samples (1000 width, 3000 mm height) were carried out considering three types of masonry (solid brick, 250 mm thick, rubble stone and cobblestones, 400 mm thick). The performances of plain and reinforced specimens were analysed and compared. It emerged that strengthened specimens are able to resist out-of-plane bending moments almost 4–5 times greater than those of plain specimens; moreover they can overcome deflections more than 25 times higher, due to the presence of the GFRP mesh, which contrasts the opening of cracks. The cracking and the ultimate bending moments of reinforced samples can be analytically predicted using relationships quite close to those used in the design of reinforced concrete beams subjected to combined axial and bending actions. The results of nonlinear static analyses performed on a 2D numerical model were also presented, so to comprehend the mechanical behaviour of reinforced masonry walls. Their agreement with the experimental results proved the reliability of the simulations; moreover, the extension of the 2D model to a 3D one, necessary to analyze the behavior of perforated walls, was also made.
2017
Pubblicato
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1359836817303335
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Composites.pdf

Accesso chiuso

Descrizione: free at link: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.006
Tipologia: Documento in Versione Editoriale
Licenza: Copyright Editore
Dimensione 3.88 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.88 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
2906906_Composites-PostPrint.pdf

accesso aperto

Descrizione: PostPrint VQR3
Tipologia: Bozza finale post-referaggio (post-print)
Licenza: Digital Rights Management non definito
Dimensione 4.29 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
4.29 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
Pubblicazioni consigliate

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/11368/2906906
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 80
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 67
social impact